PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGRN vs. BOXA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BGRN vs. BOXA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares USD Green Bond ETF (BGRN) and Alpha Architect Aggregate Bond ETF (BOXA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BGRN vs. BOXA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BGRN
iShares USD Green Bond ETF
-0.35%7.27%0.02%
BOXA
Alpha Architect Aggregate Bond ETF
-0.12%5.41%0.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGRN achieves a -0.35% return, which is significantly lower than BOXA's -0.12% return.


BGRN

1D
-0.08%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
-0.35%
6M
0.46%
1Y
4.44%
3Y*
4.34%
5Y*
0.29%
10Y*

BOXA

1D
-0.00%
1M
-1.56%
YTD
-0.12%
6M
0.47%
1Y
2.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BGRN vs. BOXA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGRN has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BOXA's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

BGRN vs. BOXA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGRN
BGRN Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
BGRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGRN Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BGRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGRN Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

BOXA
BOXA Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
BOXA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOXA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOXA Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
BOXA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOXA Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGRN vs. BOXA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Green Bond ETF (BGRN) and Alpha Architect Aggregate Bond ETF (BOXA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BGRNBOXADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.26

0.67

+0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.80

0.94

+0.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.12

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

1.08

+0.93

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.94

3.43

+3.52

BGRN vs. BOXA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGRN Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is higher than the BOXA Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGRN and BOXA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BGRNBOXADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

0.67

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

1.00

-0.56

Correlation

The correlation between BGRN and BOXA is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BGRN vs. BOXA - Dividend Comparison

BGRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, more than BOXA's 0.13% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BGRN
iShares USD Green Bond ETF
4.27%4.21%4.07%3.52%2.66%0.78%1.82%3.66%0.21%
BOXA
Alpha Architect Aggregate Bond ETF
0.13%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BGRN vs. BOXA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGRN drawdown since its inception was -19.16%, which is greater than BOXA's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGRN and BOXA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BGRNBOXADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.16%

-2.87%

-16.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.23%

-2.87%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-1.98%

+0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.90%

-0.59%

-5.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.65%

0.91%

-0.26%

Volatility

BGRN vs. BOXA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares USD Green Bond ETF (BGRN) is 1.45%, while Alpha Architect Aggregate Bond ETF (BOXA) has a volatility of 1.55%. This indicates that BGRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOXA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BGRNBOXADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.45%

1.55%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.04%

2.41%

-0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.53%

4.14%

-0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.46%

4.18%

+1.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.03%

4.18%

+0.85%