BGRFX vs. BFTHX
BGRFX (Baron Growth Fund) and BFTHX (Baron Fifth Avenue Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - BGRFX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Baron Capital, while BFTHX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Baron Capital. Over the past 10 years, BGRFX returned 7.18%/yr vs 15.59%/yr for BFTHX. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BGRFX charges 1.29%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for BFTHX.
Performance
BGRFX vs. BFTHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGRFX achieves a -6.97% return, which is significantly lower than BFTHX's 9.94% return. Over the past 10 years, BGRFX has underperformed BFTHX with an annualized return of 7.18%, while BFTHX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.59% annualized return.
BGRFX
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 2.29%
- 6M
- 1.04%
- YTD
- -6.97%
- 1Y
- -15.70%
- 3Y*
- -4.81%
- 5Y*
- -4.63%
- 10Y*
- 7.18%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.62%
BFTHX
- 1D
- 2.58%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 14.59%
- YTD
- 9.94%
- 1Y
- 16.99%
- 3Y*
- 25.54%
- 5Y*
- 5.79%
- 10Y*
- 15.59%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.20%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
BGRFX Baron Growth Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
BGRFX vs. BFTHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGRFX Baron Growth Fund | -6.97% | -14.51% | 4.62% | 14.68% | -22.55% | 19.82% | 32.77% | 40.18% | -2.93% | 27.14% |
BFTHX Baron Fifth Avenue Growth Fund | 9.94% | 18.01% | 37.38% | 57.20% | -50.62% | 10.88% | 50.42% | 33.98% | 1.10% | 40.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGRFX and BFTHX is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2004 | 0.77 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BGRFX and BFTHX has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGRFX vs. BFTHX — Risk / Return Rank
BGRFX
BFTHX
BGRFX vs. BFTHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Growth Fund (BGRFX) and Baron Fifth Avenue Growth Fund (BFTHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BGRFX | BFTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.15 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 1.10 | -1.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.94 | 3.33 | -4.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BGRFX vs. BFTHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGRFX drawdown since its inception was -56.10%, roughly equal to the maximum BFTHX drawdown of -58.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGRFX and BFTHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGRFX | BFTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.10% | -58.84% | +2.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.86% | -17.62% | -6.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.03% | -29.22% | -3.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.02% | -58.84% | +23.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.14% | -58.84% | +17.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.28% | -2.78% | -24.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.95% | -11.81% | +2.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.77% | 5.81% | +8.96% |
Volatility
BGRFX vs. BFTHX - Volatility Comparison
Baron Growth Fund (BGRFX) has a higher volatility of 10.19% compared to Baron Fifth Avenue Growth Fund (BFTHX) at 6.60%. This indicates that BGRFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BFTHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGRFX | BFTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.19% | 6.60% | +3.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.44% | 17.59% | +1.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.87% | 22.98% | -0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.92% | 31.28% | -10.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.47% | 27.28% | -5.81% |
BGRFX vs. BFTHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGRFX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than BFTHX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
BGRFX vs. BFTHX - Dividend Comparison
BGRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.48%, more than BFTHX's 3.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFTHX Baron Fifth Avenue Growth Fund | 3.74% | 4.11% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.19% | 0.36% | 2.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BGRFX Baron Growth Fund | 22.48% | 20.91% | 12.05% | 1.79% | 6.02% | 7.73% | 4.64% | 3.68% | 8.38% | 11.68% | 12.84% | 9.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BGRFX and BFTHX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BGRFX has higher volatility (10.19%) compared to BFTHX (6.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGRFX dropped -56.10% vs BFTHX's -58.84%.
BFTHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BGRFX and BFTHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer