PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGNMX vs. GSUIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BGNMX vs. GSUIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Ginnie Mae Fund (BGNMX) and Goldman Sachs U.S. Mortgages Fund (GSUIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGNMX achieves a -0.40% return, which is significantly higher than GSUIX's -0.61% return. Over the past 10 years, BGNMX has underperformed GSUIX with an annualized return of 0.72%, while GSUIX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.02% annualized return.


BGNMX

1D
0.34%
1M
-1.45%
6M
-0.83%
YTD
-0.40%
1Y
2.49%
3Y*
3.81%
5Y*
-0.37%
10Y*
0.72%
ALL TIME*
3.87%

GSUIX

1D
0.22%
1M
-1.33%
6M
-0.93%
YTD
-0.61%
1Y
2.69%
3Y*
3.88%
5Y*
-0.59%
10Y*
1.02%
ALL TIME*
2.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BGNMX vs. GSUIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BGNMX
American Century Ginnie Mae Fund
-0.40%7.43%0.52%4.72%-12.06%-1.79%3.73%6.17%0.44%1.22%
GSUIX
Goldman Sachs U.S. Mortgages Fund
-0.61%8.31%0.61%4.51%-13.09%-1.35%5.79%6.39%0.72%1.82%

Correlation

The correlation between BGNMX and GSUIX is 0.95, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2004

0.87

The correlation between BGNMX and GSUIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BGNMX vs. GSUIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BGNMX
BGNMX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
BGNMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGNMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGNMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
BGNMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGNMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

GSUIX
GSUIX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
GSUIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSUIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSUIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
GSUIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSUIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BGNMX vs. GSUIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Ginnie Mae Fund (BGNMX) and Goldman Sachs U.S. Mortgages Fund (GSUIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BGNMXGSUIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.12

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

0.90

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.29

2.32

-0.03

BGNMX vs. GSUIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGNMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is comparable to the GSUIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGNMX and GSUIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BGNMX vs. GSUIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGNMX drawdown since its inception was -18.46%, roughly equal to the maximum GSUIX drawdown of -19.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGNMX and GSUIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGNMXGSUIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.46%

-19.29%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.07%

-3.15%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.67%

-6.81%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.69%

-18.76%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.46%

-19.29%

+0.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.72%

-3.35%

+0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.03%

-2.62%

+0.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.14%

1.22%

-0.08%

Volatility

BGNMX vs. GSUIX - Volatility Comparison

American Century Ginnie Mae Fund (BGNMX) has a higher volatility of 1.33% compared to Goldman Sachs U.S. Mortgages Fund (GSUIX) at 1.17%. This indicates that BGNMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSUIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGNMXGSUIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.33%

1.17%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.31%

3.30%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.99%

4.04%

-0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.50%

6.63%

-0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.87%

5.05%

-0.18%

BGNMX vs. GSUIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGNMX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than GSUIX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

BGNMX vs. GSUIX - Dividend Comparison

BGNMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, less than GSUIX's 3.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGNMX
American Century Ginnie Mae Fund
3.66%3.86%3.70%3.21%1.90%1.64%2.16%2.68%2.65%2.37%2.37%2.37%
GSUIX
Goldman Sachs U.S. Mortgages Fund
3.74%4.01%3.45%3.14%1.87%1.67%2.88%3.26%2.94%2.58%2.65%2.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, BGNMX and GSUIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BGNMX has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to GSUIX (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGNMX dropped -18.46% vs GSUIX's -19.29%.

GSUIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGNMX and GSUIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer