PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGLYX vs. GLPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BGLYX vs. GLPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX) and Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGLYX achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly lower than GLPIX's 17.79% return. Over the past 10 years, BGLYX has underperformed GLPIX with an annualized return of 6.39%, while GLPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.36% annualized return.


BGLYX

1D
1.30%
1M
-3.33%
YTD
8.61%
6M
8.20%
1Y
14.02%
3Y*
11.28%
5Y*
6.97%
10Y*
6.39%

GLPIX

1D
1.01%
1M
-1.33%
YTD
17.79%
6M
17.05%
1Y
18.66%
3Y*
22.25%
5Y*
18.92%
10Y*
8.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGLYX vs. GLPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BGLYX
Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund
8.61%13.04%9.01%3.32%-5.47%16.13%-3.25%25.44%-8.06%10.79%
GLPIX
Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund
17.79%4.45%28.00%19.67%26.06%39.89%-31.08%7.04%-14.57%-5.13%

Correlation

The correlation between BGLYX and GLPIX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between BGLYX and GLPIX has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BGLYX vs. GLPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGLYX
BGLYX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
BGLYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGLYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGLYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
BGLYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGLYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

GLPIX
GLPIX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
GLPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
GLPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGLYX vs. GLPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX) and Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BGLYXGLPIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.31

1.76

-0.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.88

2.42

-0.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.30

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

3.15

-0.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.21

9.30

-2.09

BGLYX vs. GLPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGLYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the GLPIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGLYX and GLPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BGLYXGLPIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

1.76

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.99

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.32

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.19

+0.29

Drawdowns

BGLYX vs. GLPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGLYX drawdown since its inception was -36.54%, smaller than the maximum GLPIX drawdown of -75.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGLYX and GLPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGLYXGLPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.54%

-75.98%

+39.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.32%

-6.43%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.56%

-13.96%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.94%

-20.89%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.54%

-70.48%

+33.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.48%

-4.23%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.85%

-23.14%

+15.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

2.17%

-0.25%

Volatility

BGLYX vs. GLPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX) is 3.58%, while Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX) has a volatility of 4.82%. This indicates that BGLYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGLYXGLPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

4.82%

-1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.55%

8.64%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.54%

11.53%

-0.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.60%

19.13%

-5.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.64%

25.91%

-10.27%

BGLYX vs. GLPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGLYX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than GLPIX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

BGLYX vs. GLPIX - Dividend Comparison

BGLYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.53%, more than GLPIX's 6.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGLYX
Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund
28.53%30.30%1.89%1.88%7.34%4.53%3.71%3.94%4.31%4.03%4.09%4.03%
GLPIX
Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund
6.36%7.03%6.60%6.70%6.00%6.26%9.72%8.67%8.02%7.49%11.46%6.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


BGLYX and GLPIX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLPIX has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to BGLYX (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGLYX dropped -36.54% vs GLPIX's -75.98%.

GLPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGLYX and GLPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer