BGLYX vs. GLPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX) and Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX).
BGLYX is managed by Brookfield Investment Funds. It was launched on Nov 29, 2011. GLPIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Mar 27, 2013.
Performance
BGLYX vs. GLPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BGLYX vs. GLPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGLYX Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund | 8.53% | 13.04% | 9.01% | 3.32% | -5.47% | 16.13% | -3.25% | 25.44% | -8.06% | 10.79% |
GLPIX Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund | 16.94% | 4.45% | 28.00% | 19.67% | 26.06% | 39.89% | -31.08% | 7.04% | -14.57% | -5.13% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGLYX achieves a 8.53% return, which is significantly lower than GLPIX's 16.94% return. Over the past 10 years, BGLYX has underperformed GLPIX with an annualized return of 7.28%, while GLPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.37% annualized return.
BGLYX
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -4.56%
- YTD
- 8.53%
- 6M
- 9.80%
- 1Y
- 17.54%
- 3Y*
- 10.89%
- 5Y*
- 8.15%
- 10Y*
- 7.28%
GLPIX
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 16.94%
- 6M
- 19.22%
- 1Y
- 13.69%
- 3Y*
- 22.54%
- 5Y*
- 22.87%
- 10Y*
- 10.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BGLYX vs. GLPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGLYX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than GLPIX's 1.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BGLYX vs. GLPIX — Risk / Return Rank
BGLYX
GLPIX
BGLYX vs. GLPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX) and Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGLYX | GLPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.52 | 0.87 | +0.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.04 | 1.18 | +0.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.18 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 0.96 | +1.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.89 | 2.41 | +7.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGLYX | GLPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | 0.87 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 1.20 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.40 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.19 | +0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between BGLYX and GLPIX is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BGLYX vs. GLPIX - Dividend Comparison
BGLYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.55%, more than GLPIX's 6.21% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGLYX Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund | 28.55% | 30.30% | 1.89% | 1.88% | 7.34% | 4.53% | 3.71% | 3.94% | 4.31% | 4.03% | 4.09% | 4.03% |
GLPIX Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund | 6.21% | 7.03% | 6.60% | 6.70% | 6.00% | 6.26% | 9.72% | 8.67% | 8.02% | 7.49% | 11.46% | 6.62% |
Drawdowns
BGLYX vs. GLPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGLYX drawdown since its inception was -36.54%, smaller than the maximum GLPIX drawdown of -75.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGLYX and GLPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGLYX | GLPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.54% | -75.98% | +39.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.55% | -13.62% | +6.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.94% | -20.89% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.54% | -70.48% | +33.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.56% | -1.00% | -3.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.92% | -23.44% | +15.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | 5.41% | -3.54% |
Volatility
BGLYX vs. GLPIX - Volatility Comparison
Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX) has a higher volatility of 3.90% compared to Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX) at 3.17%. This indicates that BGLYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BGLYX | GLPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.90% | 3.17% | +0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.35% | 7.52% | -0.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.09% | 15.45% | -3.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.46% | 19.22% | -5.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.62% | 26.09% | -10.47% |