BGLYX vs. CSUIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX).
BGLYX is managed by Brookfield Investment Funds. It was launched on Nov 29, 2011. CSUIX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on May 2, 2004.
Performance
BGLYX vs. CSUIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BGLYX vs. CSUIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGLYX Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund | 8.53% | 13.04% | 9.01% | 3.32% | -5.47% | 16.13% | -3.25% | 25.44% | -8.06% | 10.79% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 8.44% | 14.69% | 8.74% | 2.46% | -4.89% | 16.60% | -1.29% | 24.72% | -5.52% | 18.15% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BGLYX having a 8.53% return and CSUIX slightly lower at 8.44%. Over the past 10 years, BGLYX has underperformed CSUIX with an annualized return of 7.28%, while CSUIX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.83% annualized return.
BGLYX
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -4.56%
- YTD
- 8.53%
- 6M
- 9.80%
- 1Y
- 17.54%
- 3Y*
- 10.89%
- 5Y*
- 8.15%
- 10Y*
- 7.28%
CSUIX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- 8.44%
- 6M
- 9.16%
- 1Y
- 18.40%
- 3Y*
- 11.18%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 7.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BGLYX vs. CSUIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGLYX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than CSUIX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BGLYX vs. CSUIX — Risk / Return Rank
BGLYX
CSUIX
BGLYX vs. CSUIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGLYX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.52 | 1.67 | -0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.04 | 2.21 | -0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.33 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 2.42 | +0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.89 | 10.58 | -0.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGLYX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | 1.67 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.64 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.53 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.58 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between BGLYX and CSUIX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BGLYX vs. CSUIX - Dividend Comparison
BGLYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.55%, more than CSUIX's 7.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGLYX Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund | 28.55% | 30.30% | 1.89% | 1.88% | 7.34% | 4.53% | 3.71% | 3.94% | 4.31% | 4.03% | 4.09% | 4.03% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 7.76% | 8.41% | 2.58% | 2.53% | 3.91% | 3.25% | 1.64% | 1.83% | 2.45% | 5.12% | 2.35% | 6.52% |
Drawdowns
BGLYX vs. CSUIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGLYX drawdown since its inception was -36.54%, smaller than the maximum CSUIX drawdown of -52.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGLYX and CSUIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGLYX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.54% | -52.01% | +15.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.55% | -7.99% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.94% | -20.01% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.54% | -35.01% | -1.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.56% | -4.36% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.92% | -8.21% | +0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | 1.82% | +0.05% |
Volatility
BGLYX vs. CSUIX - Volatility Comparison
Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX) has a higher volatility of 3.90% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) at 3.24%. This indicates that BGLYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BGLYX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.90% | 3.24% | +0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.35% | 6.90% | +0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.09% | 11.49% | +0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.46% | 12.86% | +0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.62% | 14.88% | +0.74% |