BGLD vs. OCTB
BGLD (FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF) and OCTB (Aptus October Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BGLD charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for OCTB.
Performance
BGLD vs. OCTB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGLD achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly lower than OCTB's 6.18% return.
BGLD
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- YTD
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 1.34%
- 1Y
- 12.93%
- 3Y*
- 19.37%
- 5Y*
- 11.20%
- 10Y*
- —
OCTB
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 2.41%
- YTD
- 6.18%
- 6M
- 6.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BGLD vs. OCTB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BGLD FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF | 0.32% | 1.02% |
OCTB Aptus October Buffer ETF | 6.18% | 2.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGLD and OCTB is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGLD vs. OCTB — Risk / Return Rank
BGLD
OCTB
BGLD vs. OCTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD) and Aptus October Buffer ETF (OCTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGLD | OCTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.72 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGLD | OCTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 1.97 | -0.92 |
Drawdowns
BGLD vs. OCTB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGLD drawdown since its inception was -16.19%, which is greater than OCTB's maximum drawdown of -4.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGLD and OCTB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGLD | OCTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.19% | -4.79% | -11.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.22% | -0.17% | -7.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.64% | -0.70% | -2.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.49% | — | — |
Volatility
BGLD vs. OCTB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGLD | OCTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.20% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.04% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.90% | 7.20% | +4.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.97% | 7.20% | +2.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.89% | 7.20% | +2.69% |
BGLD vs. OCTB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGLD has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than OCTB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
BGLD vs. OCTB - Dividend Comparison
BGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.18%, while OCTB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGLD FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF | 44.18% | 44.32% | 25.04% | 10.49% | 0.40% |
OCTB Aptus October Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BGLD and OCTB have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OCTB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OCTB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.91% for BGLD.
BGLD has the higher dividend yield at 44.18%, compared with 0.00% for OCTB.
They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.91% for BGLD and 0.25% for OCTB.
Find the right allocation for BGLD and OCTB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer