PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
BGIE.TO vs. BEPR.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

BGIE.TO vs. BEPR.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

BGIE.TO (Brompton Global Infrastructure ETF) and BEPR.TO (Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Enhanced Investment Grade Preferred ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BGIE.TO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Brompton, while BEPR.TO is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by Brompton. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BGIE.TO returned 13.31%/yr vs 1.47%/yr for BEPR.TO. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

BGIE.TO vs. BEPR.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Brompton Global Infrastructure ETF (BGIE.TO) and Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Enhanced Investment Grade Preferred ETF (BEPR.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGIE.TO achieves a 12.79% return, which is significantly higher than BEPR.TO's 0.27% return.

BGIE.TO

1D
-0.15%
1M
-0.96%
6M
8.20%
YTD
12.79%
1Y
20.19%
3Y*
21.22%
5Y*
13.31%
10Y*
—

BEPR.TO

1D
0.83%
1M
0.12%
6M
0.49%
YTD
0.27%
1Y
4.79%
3Y*
10.18%
5Y*
1.47%
10Y*
4.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGIE.TO vs. BEPR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BGIE.TO
Brompton Global Infrastructure ETF		12.79%21.56%24.37%5.45%-2.37%18.61%10.30%
BEPR.TO
Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Enhanced Investment Grade Preferred ETF		0.27%6.68%14.36%6.62%-19.22%8.37%22.64%

Correlation

The correlation between BGIE.TO and BEPR.TO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2020

0.20

Over the past year, BGIE.TO and BEPR.TO have become more correlated (0.40) than their long-term average of 0.20, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Brompton Global Infrastructure ETF

Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Enhanced Investment Grade Preferred ETF

Often compared with BGIE.TO:
BGIE.TO vs. KNGX.TOBGIE.TO vs. FCIN.NEOBGIE.TO vs. XDG.TOBGIE.TO vs. XEQT.TOBGIE.TO vs. VMO.TOBGIE.TO vs. PAYG.TOBGIE.TO vs. VXC.TO

Return for Risk

BGIE.TO vs. BEPR.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
BGIE.TO
BGIE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
BGIE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGIE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGIE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
BGIE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGIE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
BEPR.TO
BEPR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
BEPR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BEPR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
BEPR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
BEPR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
BEPR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGIE.TO vs. BEPR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Global Infrastructure ETF (BGIE.TO) and Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Enhanced Investment Grade Preferred ETF (BEPR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

BGIE.TOBEPR.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.34
0.59

+0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.93
0.90

+1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.11

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

0.99

+1.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.52

3.26

+4.27

BGIE.TO vs. BEPR.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGIE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is higher than the BEPR.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGIE.TO and BEPR.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BGIE.TO vs. BEPR.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGIE.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.24%, smaller than the maximum BEPR.TO drawdown of -69.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGIE.TO and BEPR.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

BGIE.TOBEPR.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.24%

-69.85%

+51.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.35%

-4.84%

-3.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.02%

-6.15%

-10.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.24%

-27.03%

+8.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-51.41%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.89%

-0.97%

-2.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.43%

-12.44%

+8.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

1.48%

+1.21%

Volatility

BGIE.TO vs. BEPR.TO - Volatility Comparison

Brompton Global Infrastructure ETF (BGIE.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.66% compared to Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Enhanced Investment Grade Preferred ETF (BEPR.TO) at 2.03%. This indicates that BGIE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BEPR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

BGIE.TOBEPR.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.66%

2.03%

+1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.73%

6.57%

+5.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.11%

8.13%

+6.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.90%

11.70%

+4.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.25%

16.11%

-0.86%

Dividends

BGIE.TO vs. BEPR.TO - Dividend Comparison

BGIE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, less than BEPR.TO's 8.95% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BEPR.TO
Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Enhanced Investment Grade Preferred ETF		8.95%9.28%9.19%9.58%9.26%6.87%6.37%6.70%9.17%7.43%8.31%9.40%
BGIE.TO
Brompton Global Infrastructure ETF		5.04%4.95%4.89%5.19%4.79%4.10%3.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

BGIE.TO and BEPR.TO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BGIE.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while BEPR.TO is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGIE.TO and BEPR.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer