PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGHSX vs. XILSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BGHSX vs. XILSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX) and Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGHSX achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly lower than XILSX's 7.97% return.


BGHSX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.53%
YTD
0.34%
6M
0.72%
1Y
4.90%
3Y*
8.07%
5Y*
10Y*

XILSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.97%
YTD
7.97%
6M
10.49%
1Y
24.81%
3Y*
19.66%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGHSX vs. XILSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BGHSX
BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund
0.34%5.55%9.90%13.21%-10.23%1.12%
XILSX
Pioneer ILS Interval Fund
7.97%18.70%18.93%18.65%1.23%-3.16%

Correlation

The correlation between BGHSX and XILSX is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2021

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BGHSX vs. XILSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGHSX
BGHSX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
BGHSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGHSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGHSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
BGHSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGHSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

XILSX
XILSX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
XILSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XILSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
XILSX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
XILSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
XILSX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGHSX vs. XILSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX) and Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BGHSXXILSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-6.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-78.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

43.21

-41.86

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

117.99

-116.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.79

805.46

-797.67

BGHSX vs. XILSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGHSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is lower than the XILSX Sharpe Ratio of 8.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGHSX and XILSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BGHSXXILSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

8.17

-6.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

3.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

1.63

-0.78

Drawdowns

BGHSX vs. XILSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGHSX drawdown since its inception was -14.30%, roughly equal to the maximum XILSX drawdown of -14.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGHSX and XILSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGHSXXILSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.30%

-14.53%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.67%

-0.21%

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.55%

-2.36%

-2.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.24%

-4.91%

+1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

0.03%

+0.63%

Volatility

BGHSX vs. XILSX - Volatility Comparison

BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX) has a higher volatility of 0.91% compared to Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX) at 0.43%. This indicates that BGHSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XILSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGHSXXILSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.91%

0.43%

+0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.31%

2.11%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.16%

3.08%

+0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.48%

3.77%

+0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.48%

3.93%

+0.55%

BGHSX vs. XILSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGHSX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than XILSX's 1.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

BGHSX vs. XILSX - Dividend Comparison

BGHSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.25%, less than XILSX's 8.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BGHSX
BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund
6.25%7.08%7.49%5.23%5.32%4.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XILSX
Pioneer ILS Interval Fund
8.81%9.51%13.06%12.82%2.68%2.04%5.20%6.63%6.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


BGHSX and XILSX have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BGHSX has higher volatility (0.91%) compared to XILSX (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGHSX dropped -14.30% vs XILSX's -14.53%.

XILSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.17 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGHSX and XILSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer