BGHSX vs. EMO
Compare and contrast key facts about BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX) and ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO).
BGHSX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Dec 3, 2014. EMO is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 10, 2011.
Performance
BGHSX vs. EMO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BGHSX vs. EMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGHSX BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund | -1.56% | 5.55% | 9.90% | 13.21% | -10.23% | 1.12% |
EMO ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund | 16.71% | 7.38% | 44.45% | 31.76% | 40.13% | 10.14% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGHSX achieves a -1.56% return, which is significantly lower than EMO's 16.71% return.
BGHSX
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -1.20%
- YTD
- -1.56%
- 6M
- -0.96%
- 1Y
- 3.40%
- 3Y*
- 7.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMO
- 1D
- -3.45%
- 1M
- -3.66%
- YTD
- 16.71%
- 6M
- 19.20%
- 1Y
- 14.50%
- 3Y*
- 33.42%
- 5Y*
- 32.26%
- 10Y*
- 9.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BGHSX vs. EMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGHSX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than EMO's 13.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BGHSX vs. EMO — Risk / Return Rank
BGHSX
EMO
BGHSX vs. EMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX) and ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGHSX | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.91 | 0.67 | +0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.29 | 1.00 | +0.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.15 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 0.81 | +0.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.19 | 2.44 | +1.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGHSX | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 0.67 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.11 | +0.67 |
Correlation
The correlation between BGHSX and EMO is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BGHSX vs. EMO - Dividend Comparison
BGHSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.48%, less than EMO's 8.40% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGHSX BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund | 6.48% | 7.08% | 7.49% | 5.23% | 5.32% | 4.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EMO ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund | 8.40% | 9.41% | 7.16% | 6.79% | 6.71% | 6.71% | 15.82% | 10.94% | 16.39% | 10.85% | 9.76% | 11.88% |
Drawdowns
BGHSX vs. EMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGHSX drawdown since its inception was -14.30%, smaller than the maximum EMO drawdown of -95.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGHSX and EMO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGHSX | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.30% | -95.06% | +80.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.43% | -18.81% | +15.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -93.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.60% | -5.90% | +4.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.33% | -32.26% | +28.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.91% | 6.23% | -5.32% |
Volatility
BGHSX vs. EMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX) is 1.17%, while ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO) has a volatility of 5.53%. This indicates that BGHSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BGHSX | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.17% | 5.53% | -4.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.16% | 11.68% | -9.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.89% | 21.67% | -17.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.50% | 26.82% | -22.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.50% | 41.42% | -36.92% |