BGHSX vs. ARDC

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX) and Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc. (ARDC).

BGHSX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Dec 3, 2014.

Performance

BGHSX vs. ARDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX) and Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc. (ARDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BGHSX vs. ARDC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BGHSX BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund	-1.56%	5.55%	9.90%	13.21%	-10.23%	1.12%
ARDC Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc.	-6.29%	-3.10%	21.05%	32.35%	-22.21%	4.86%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGHSX achieves a -1.56% return, which is significantly higher than ARDC's -6.29% return.

BGHSX

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: -1.20%
• YTD: -1.56%
• 6M: -0.96%
• 1Y: 3.40%
• 3Y*: 7.83%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARDC

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -2.97%
• YTD: -6.29%
• 6M: -9.02%
• 1Y: -4.78%
• 3Y*: 11.11%
• 5Y*: 5.27%
• 10Y*: 8.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BGHSX vs. ARDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGHSX

BGHSX Risk / Return Rank: 40
BGHSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
BGHSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
BGHSX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
BGHSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
BGHSX Martin Ratio Rank: 37

ARDC

ARDC Risk / Return Rank: 25
ARDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
ARDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
ARDC Omega Ratio Rank: 20
ARDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
ARDC Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGHSX vs. ARDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX) and Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc. (ARDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BGHSX	ARDC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.91	-0.33	+1.24
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.29	-0.33	+1.63
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	0.94	+0.26
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.11	-0.32	+1.43
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.19	-0.79	+4.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BGHSX vs. ARDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGHSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is higher than the ARDC Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGHSX and ARDC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BGHSX	ARDC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91	-0.33	+1.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.39	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	0.34	+0.44

Correlation

The correlation between BGHSX and ARDC is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BGHSX vs. ARDC - Dividend Comparison

BGHSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.48%, less than ARDC's 11.12% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BGHSX BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund	6.48%	7.08%	7.49%	5.23%	5.32%	4.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ARDC Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc.	11.12%	10.19%	9.33%	9.85%	10.31%	7.16%	8.40%	8.40%	9.35%	7.58%	8.45%	10.51%

Drawdowns

BGHSX vs. ARDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGHSX drawdown since its inception was -14.30%, smaller than the maximum ARDC drawdown of -45.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGHSX and ARDC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BGHSX	ARDC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.30%	-45.40%	+31.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.43%	-15.57%	+12.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.48%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.60%	-13.43%	+11.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.33%	-6.60%	+3.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.91%	6.40%	-5.49%

Volatility

BGHSX vs. ARDC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX) is 1.17%, while Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc. (ARDC) has a volatility of 4.86%. This indicates that BGHSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BGHSX	ARDC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.17%	4.86%	-3.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.16%	7.40%	-5.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.89%	14.48%	-10.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.50%	13.73%	-9.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.50%	16.84%	-12.34%