BGGG vs. VXUS
BGGG (Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both Global Equities funds. BGGG is actively managed, while VXUS is passively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BGGG charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXUS.
Performance
BGGG vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BGGG
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VXUS
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -1.02%
- 6M
- 11.46%
- YTD
- 13.08%
- 1Y
- 25.63%
- 3Y*
- 18.21%
- 5Y*
- 8.55%
- 10Y*
- 9.84%
BGGG vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BGGG Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF | -2.09% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | -0.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGGG and VXUS is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2026 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGGG vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank
BGGG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VXUS
BGGG vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF (BGGG) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BGGG | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.31 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.78 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BGGG vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGGG drawdown since its inception was -9.83%, smaller than the maximum VXUS drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGGG and VXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGGG | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.83% | -35.97% | +26.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.89% | -2.55% | -0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.06% | -8.19% | +3.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.96% | — |
Volatility
BGGG vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGGG | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.97% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.53% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.32% | 16.35% | +12.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.32% | 16.28% | +13.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.32% | 16.99% | +12.33% |
BGGG vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGGG has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
BGGG vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
BGGG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGGG Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.58% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BGGG and VXUS have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BGGG.
VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 0.00% for BGGG.
They also come from different issuers: Baillie Gifford and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BGGG and 0.05% for VXUS.
Find the right allocation for BGGG and VXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer