BGGG vs. VOLT
BGGG (Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF) and VOLT (Tema Electrification ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BGGG charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for VOLT.
Performance
BGGG vs. VOLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BGGG
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VOLT
- 1D
- -3.00%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- 6M
- 31.75%
- YTD
- 35.42%
- 1Y
- 53.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BGGG vs. VOLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BGGG Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF | -2.09% |
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF | 0.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGGG and VOLT is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2026 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGGG vs. VOLT — Risk / Return Rank
BGGG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VOLT
BGGG vs. VOLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF (BGGG) and Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BGGG | VOLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.40 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.74 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.82 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BGGG vs. VOLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGGG drawdown since its inception was -9.83%, smaller than the maximum VOLT drawdown of -23.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGGG and VOLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGGG | VOLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.83% | -23.40% | +13.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.89% | -6.85% | +3.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.06% | -5.11% | +0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.47% | — |
Volatility
BGGG vs. VOLT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGGG | VOLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.61% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.32% | 22.77% | +6.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.32% | 24.98% | +4.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.32% | 24.98% | +4.34% |
BGGG vs. VOLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGGG has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than VOLT's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
BGGG vs. VOLT - Dividend Comparison
BGGG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BGGG Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF | 0.34% | 0.46% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BGGG and VOLT have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BGGG is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BGGG is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for VOLT.
VOLT has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.00% for BGGG.
They also come from different issuers: Baillie Gifford and Tema. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BGGG and 0.75% for VOLT.
Find the right allocation for BGGG and VOLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer