BGGG vs. UFO
BGGG (Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF) and UFO (Procure Space ETF) are both Global Equities funds. BGGG is actively managed, while UFO is passively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BGGG charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UFO.
Performance
BGGG vs. UFO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BGGG
- 1D
- -1.77%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
UFO
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -9.05%
- 6M
- -6.56%
- YTD
- 13.26%
- 1Y
- 38.85%
- 3Y*
- 31.49%
- 5Y*
- 9.84%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.49%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.34M | $1.75M | $2.63M | |
| $27.34M | $34.38M | $72.37M |
BGGG vs. UFO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BGGG Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF | -6.59% |
UFO Procure Space ETF | -32.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGGG and UFO is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2026 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGGG vs. UFO — Risk / Return Rank
BGGG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UFO
BGGG vs. UFO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF (BGGG) and Procure Space ETF (UFO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BGGG | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.17 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.07 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.15 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BGGG vs. UFO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGGG drawdown since its inception was -9.83%, smaller than the maximum UFO drawdown of -50.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGGG and UFO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGGG | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.83% | -50.33% | +40.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -36.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -36.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -49.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.35% | -35.44% | +28.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.45% | -21.92% | +17.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 12.40% | — |
Volatility
BGGG vs. UFO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGGG | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.03% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 33.21% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.72% | 41.78% | -16.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.72% | 30.86% | -5.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.72% | 31.25% | -5.53% |
BGGG vs. UFO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGGG has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than UFO's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
BGGG vs. UFO - Dividend Comparison
BGGG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGGG Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UFO Procure Space ETF | 0.34% | 0.46% | 1.98% | 1.90% | 3.19% | 1.00% | 1.07% | 0.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BGGG and UFO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BGGG is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BGGG is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UFO.
UFO has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.00% for BGGG.
They also come from different issuers: Baillie Gifford and ProcureAM. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BGGG and 0.75% for UFO.
Find the right allocation for BGGG and UFO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer