BGGG vs. FYLD
BGGG (Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF) and FYLD (Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BGGG charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FYLD.
Performance
BGGG vs. FYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BGGG
- 1D
- -1.77%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
FYLD
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 3.12%
- 6M
- 12.81%
- YTD
- 19.61%
- 1Y
- 30.44%
- 3Y*
- 20.44%
- 5Y*
- 12.63%
- 10Y*
- 11.64%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.18%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.34M | $1.75M | $2.63M | |
| $1.76M | $1.98M | $3.55M |
BGGG vs. FYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BGGG Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF | -6.59% |
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 1.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGGG and FYLD is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2026 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGGG vs. FYLD — Risk / Return Rank
BGGG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FYLD
BGGG vs. FYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF (BGGG) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BGGG | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.44 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.39 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 16.17 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BGGG vs. FYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGGG drawdown since its inception was -9.83%, smaller than the maximum FYLD drawdown of -44.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGGG and FYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGGG | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.83% | -44.55% | +34.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.35% | -0.62% | -6.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.45% | -8.76% | +4.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.90% | — |
Volatility
BGGG vs. FYLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGGG | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.25% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.72% | 12.14% | +13.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.72% | 16.17% | +9.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.72% | 17.74% | +7.98% |
BGGG vs. FYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGGG has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
BGGG vs. FYLD - Dividend Comparison
BGGG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGGG Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 3.37% | 4.07% | 5.41% | 6.06% | 6.13% | 4.74% | 3.94% | 3.73% | 5.17% | 2.85% | 2.72% | 3.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BGGG and FYLD have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FYLD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FYLD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BGGG.
FYLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.37%, compared with 0.00% for BGGG.
They also come from different issuers: Baillie Gifford and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BGGG and 0.59% for FYLD.
Find the right allocation for BGGG and FYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer