BGELX vs. DBLTX

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

BGELX (Baillie Gifford Emerging Markets Equities Fund) and DBLTX (DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I) are both mutual funds - BGELX is a Emerging Markets Equities fund managed by Baillie Gifford, while DBLTX is a Total Bond Market fund actively managed by DoubleLine. Over the past 5 years, BGELX returned 7.72%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for DBLTX. Their -0.04 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BGELX charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DBLTX.

Performance

BGELX vs. DBLTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baillie Gifford Emerging Markets Equities Fund (BGELX) and DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGELX achieves a 25.68% return, which is significantly higher than DBLTX's -0.92% return.

BGELX

• 1D: 1.10%
• 1M: 8.59%
• 6M: 12.23%
• YTD: 25.68%
• 1Y: 49.55%
• 3Y*: 23.67%
• 5Y*: 7.72%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.38%

DBLTX

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: -1.15%
• 6M: -1.15%
• YTD: -0.92%
• 1Y: 1.68%
• 3Y*: 4.68%
• 5Y*: 0.14%
• 10Y*: 1.59%
• ALL TIME*: 3.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BGELX Baillie Gifford Emerging Markets Equities Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
DBLTX DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

BGELX vs. DBLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BGELX Baillie Gifford Emerging Markets Equities Fund	25.68%	40.75%	6.04%	14.42%	-26.46%	-8.93%	29.66%	28.10%	-14.87%	50.50%
DBLTX DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I	-0.92%	8.05%	3.08%	5.34%	-12.56%	0.24%	4.13%	5.81%	1.76%	3.80%

Correlation

The correlation between BGELX and DBLTX is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.08
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.08
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	-0.04

The correlation between BGELX and DBLTX shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (all time) to 0.08 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BGELX vs. DBLTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BGELX

BGELX Risk / Return Rank: 90
BGELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
BGELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
BGELX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
BGELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
BGELX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

DBLTX

DBLTX Risk / Return Rank: 11
DBLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
DBLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
DBLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
DBLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
DBLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BGELX vs. DBLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford Emerging Markets Equities Fund (BGELX) and DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BGELX	DBLTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	0.51	+1.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.07	0.73	+2.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.09	+0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.65	0.61	+3.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.73	1.42	+12.31

BGELX vs. DBLTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGELX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the DBLTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGELX and DBLTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BGELX vs. DBLTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGELX drawdown since its inception was -50.47%, which is greater than DBLTX's maximum drawdown of -16.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGELX and DBLTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BGELX	DBLTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.47%	-16.49%	-33.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.91%	-3.17%	-11.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.74%	-5.33%	-14.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.63%	-16.37%	-26.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-16.49%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.82%	-2.91%	+2.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.29%	-2.37%	-15.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.92%	1.35%	+2.57%

Volatility

BGELX vs. DBLTX - Volatility Comparison

Baillie Gifford Emerging Markets Equities Fund (BGELX) has a higher volatility of 13.32% compared to DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX) at 1.25%. This indicates that BGELX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BGELX	DBLTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.32%	1.25%	+12.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.87%	3.09%	+16.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.02%	3.76%	+19.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.69%	5.63%	+16.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.91%	4.43%	+17.48%

BGELX vs. DBLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGELX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than DBLTX's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BGELX vs. DBLTX - Dividend Comparison

BGELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than DBLTX's 4.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BGELX Baillie Gifford Emerging Markets Equities Fund	1.34%	1.68%	3.52%	4.02%	5.46%	3.08%	1.31%	3.90%	10.14%	1.16%	0.00%	0.00%
DBLTX DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I	4.54%	4.86%	5.03%	4.35%	3.86%	3.12%	3.39%	3.66%	3.74%	3.65%	3.72%	4.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BGELX and DBLTX in my portfolio?

BGELX and DBLTX have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BGELX or DBLTX?

BGELX has higher volatility (13.32%) compared to DBLTX (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGELX dropped -50.47% vs DBLTX's -16.49%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BGELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.