PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGELX vs. BTLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BGELX vs. BTLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baillie Gifford Emerging Markets Equities Fund (BGELX) and Baillie Gifford International Concentrated Growth Equities Fund (BTLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BGELX vs. BTLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BGELX
Baillie Gifford Emerging Markets Equities Fund
4.16%40.75%6.04%14.42%-26.46%-8.93%29.66%28.10%-14.87%1.30%
BTLSX
Baillie Gifford International Concentrated Growth Equities Fund
-10.57%16.56%18.34%14.75%-39.64%0.71%-3.72%45.32%-13.23%-0.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGELX achieves a 4.16% return, which is significantly higher than BTLSX's -10.57% return.


BGELX

1D
3.54%
1M
-10.46%
YTD
4.16%
6M
9.36%
1Y
39.30%
3Y*
18.33%
5Y*
3.33%
10Y*

BTLSX

1D
4.10%
1M
-6.20%
YTD
-10.57%
6M
-16.45%
1Y
1.42%
3Y*
6.80%
5Y*
-3.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BGELX vs. BTLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGELX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than BTLSX's 0.81% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BGELX vs. BTLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGELX
BGELX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BGELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGELX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
BGELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGELX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

BTLSX
BTLSX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BTLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BTLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGELX vs. BTLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford Emerging Markets Equities Fund (BGELX) and Baillie Gifford International Concentrated Growth Equities Fund (BTLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BGELXBTLSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.81

0.08

+1.74

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.31

0.29

+2.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.04

+0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

-0.01

+2.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.09

-0.03

+10.13

BGELX vs. BTLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGELX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the BTLSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGELX and BTLSX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BGELXBTLSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

0.08

+1.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

-0.10

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.01

+0.48

Correlation

The correlation between BGELX and BTLSX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BGELX vs. BTLSX - Dividend Comparison

BGELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, while BTLSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BGELX
Baillie Gifford Emerging Markets Equities Fund
1.62%1.68%3.52%4.02%5.46%3.08%1.31%3.90%10.14%1.16%
BTLSX
Baillie Gifford International Concentrated Growth Equities Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%6.18%25.27%0.00%0.17%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BGELX vs. BTLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGELX drawdown since its inception was -50.47%, smaller than the maximum BTLSX drawdown of -74.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGELX and BTLSX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BGELXBTLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.47%

-74.77%

+24.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.91%

-21.66%

+6.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.88%

-55.86%

+9.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.90%

-57.67%

+45.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.81%

-39.84%

+21.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.87%

7.43%

-3.56%

Volatility

BGELX vs. BTLSX - Volatility Comparison

Baillie Gifford Emerging Markets Equities Fund (BGELX) has a higher volatility of 11.52% compared to Baillie Gifford International Concentrated Growth Equities Fund (BTLSX) at 9.49%. This indicates that BGELX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BGELXBTLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.52%

9.49%

+2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.70%

16.22%

+0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.24%

24.24%

-2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.07%

29.24%

-8.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.75%

33.49%

-11.74%