BGCKX vs. QMNNX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

BGCKX (BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares) and QMNNX (AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class N) are both Equity Market Neutral funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, BGCKX returned 8.55%/yr vs 5.90%/yr for QMNNX. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BGCKX charges 1.29%/yr vs 1.62%/yr for QMNNX.

Performance

BGCKX vs. QMNNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares (BGCKX) and AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class N (QMNNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGCKX achieves a 12.08% return, which is significantly higher than QMNNX's -6.23% return. Over the past 10 years, BGCKX has outperformed QMNNX with an annualized return of 8.55%, while QMNNX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.90% annualized return.

BGCKX

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: 1.60%
• 6M: 10.94%
• YTD: 12.08%
• 1Y: 23.63%
• 3Y*: 20.58%
• 5Y*: 13.20%
• 10Y*: 8.55%
• ALL TIME*: 7.85%

QMNNX

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: 3.72%
• 6M: -3.21%
• YTD: -6.23%
• 1Y: 5.21%
• 3Y*: 17.30%
• 5Y*: 18.24%
• 10Y*: 5.90%
• ALL TIME*: 6.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BGCKX BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
QMNNX AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class N	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

BGCKX vs. QMNNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BGCKX BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares	12.08%	18.38%	21.55%	14.60%	1.80%	3.42%	0.33%	-0.82%	2.22%	12.83%
QMNNX AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class N	-6.23%	26.19%	25.43%	16.30%	27.07%	17.38%	-19.79%	-11.55%	-11.94%	5.56%

Correlation

The correlation between BGCKX and QMNNX is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.28
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2016	0.27

The correlation between BGCKX and QMNNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BGCKX vs. QMNNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BGCKX

BGCKX Risk / Return Rank: 97
BGCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BGCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BGCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
BGCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
BGCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

QMNNX

QMNNX Risk / Return Rank: 18
QMNNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
QMNNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
QMNNX Omega Ratio Rank: 21
QMNNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
QMNNX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BGCKX vs. QMNNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares (BGCKX) and AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class N (QMNNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BGCKX	QMNNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.26	0.78	+2.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.72	1.15	+3.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.14	+0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.46	0.55	+6.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.74	1.14	+18.60

BGCKX vs. QMNNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGCKX Sharpe Ratio is 3.26, which is higher than the QMNNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGCKX and QMNNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BGCKX vs. QMNNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGCKX drawdown since its inception was -9.47%, smaller than the maximum QMNNX drawdown of -39.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGCKX and QMNNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BGCKX	QMNNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.47%	-39.22%	+29.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.23%	-9.96%	+6.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.13%	-9.96%	+5.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-5.22%	-13.98%	+8.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-9.47%	-39.22%	+29.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.09%	-6.61%	+5.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.13%	-10.57%	+8.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.22%	4.76%	-3.54%

Volatility

BGCKX vs. QMNNX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares (BGCKX) and AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class N (QMNNX) have volatilities of 2.53% and 2.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BGCKX	QMNNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.53%	2.61%	-0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.34%	5.65%	-0.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.38%	7.00%	+0.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.66%	9.30%	-2.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.89%	8.35%	-2.46%

BGCKX vs. QMNNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGCKX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is lower than QMNNX's 1.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

BGCKX vs. QMNNX - Dividend Comparison

BGCKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.57%, more than QMNNX's 1.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BGCKX BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares	11.57%	8.96%	13.25%	7.49%	0.00%	1.22%	0.34%	6.80%	0.96%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QMNNX AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class N	1.34%	1.26%	6.06%	21.67%	5.77%	1.41%	17.64%	3.86%	0.49%	3.37%	1.19%	2.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BGCKX and QMNNX in my portfolio?

BGCKX and QMNNX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BGCKX or QMNNX?

QMNNX has higher volatility (2.61%) compared to BGCKX (2.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGCKX dropped -9.47% vs QMNNX's -39.22%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BGCKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.