PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGCIX vs. FAMRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BGCIX vs. FAMRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Global Long/Short Credit Fund (BGCIX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGCIX achieves a 1.44% return, which is significantly lower than FAMRX's 14.17% return. Over the past 10 years, BGCIX has underperformed FAMRX with an annualized return of 4.24%, while FAMRX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.13% annualized return.


BGCIX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.44%
YTD
1.44%
6M
1.66%
1Y
4.36%
3Y*
7.14%
5Y*
3.23%
10Y*
4.24%

FAMRX

1D
-0.06%
1M
2.43%
YTD
14.17%
6M
13.73%
1Y
29.75%
3Y*
18.98%
5Y*
9.75%
10Y*
12.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGCIX vs. FAMRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BGCIX
BlackRock Global Long/Short Credit Fund
1.44%6.55%8.47%8.87%-8.02%3.48%10.71%7.43%-1.78%3.46%
FAMRX
Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund
14.17%20.87%12.60%18.98%-18.55%17.10%19.37%26.26%-9.21%21.08%

Correlation

The correlation between BGCIX and FAMRX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2011

0.21

The correlation between BGCIX and FAMRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BGCIX vs. FAMRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGCIX
BGCIX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
BGCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
BGCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

FAMRX
FAMRX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FAMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FAMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGCIX vs. FAMRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Global Long/Short Credit Fund (BGCIX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BGCIXFAMRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.91

1.44

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.65

3.31

+1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.56

14.35

+5.20

BGCIX vs. FAMRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGCIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.34, which is higher than the FAMRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGCIX and FAMRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BGCIX vs. FAMRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGCIX drawdown since its inception was -10.37%, smaller than the maximum FAMRX drawdown of -58.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGCIX and FAMRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGCIXFAMRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.37%

-58.65%

+48.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.99%

-9.33%

+8.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.18%

-15.35%

+13.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.78%

-26.00%

+16.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-10.37%

-30.96%

+20.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.06%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.27%

-12.30%

+11.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.24%

2.15%

-1.91%

Volatility

BGCIX vs. FAMRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Global Long/Short Credit Fund (BGCIX) is 0.42%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX) has a volatility of 5.36%. This indicates that BGCIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAMRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGCIXFAMRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.42%

5.36%

-4.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.00%

10.97%

-9.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38%

13.13%

-11.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.90%

14.78%

-12.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.15%

15.33%

-12.18%

BGCIX vs. FAMRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGCIX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than FAMRX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

BGCIX vs. FAMRX - Dividend Comparison

BGCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%, more than FAMRX's 4.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGCIX
BlackRock Global Long/Short Credit Fund
5.74%5.83%7.13%3.33%8.25%3.57%9.87%3.75%6.01%1.16%0.00%5.11%
FAMRX
Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund
4.87%5.56%3.44%1.33%5.07%3.15%1.99%5.52%5.62%2.31%0.28%4.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


BGCIX and FAMRX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAMRX has higher volatility (5.36%) compared to BGCIX (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGCIX dropped -10.37% vs FAMRX's -58.65%.

BGCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGCIX and FAMRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer