BGCG vs. VEU
BGCG (Baillie Gifford International Concentrated Growth ETF) and VEU (Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. BGCG is actively managed, while VEU is passively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BGCG charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VEU.
Performance
BGCG vs. VEU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BGCG
- 1D
- -1.57%
- 1M
- 2.59%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
VEU
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- -0.98%
- 6M
- 6.85%
- YTD
- 11.90%
- 1Y
- 21.75%
- 3Y*
- 17.15%
- 5Y*
- 8.79%
- 10Y*
- 9.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.39%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $385.06K | $425.45K | $574.62K | |
| $267.93M | $223.22M | $216.49M |
BGCG vs. VEU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BGCG Baillie Gifford International Concentrated Growth ETF | -1.63% |
VEU Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF | -2.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGCG and VEU is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2026 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGCG vs. VEU — Risk / Return Rank
BGCG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VEU
BGCG vs. VEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford International Concentrated Growth ETF (BGCG) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BGCG | VEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.91 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.07 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BGCG vs. VEU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGCG drawdown since its inception was -5.68%, smaller than the maximum VEU drawdown of -61.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGCG and VEU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGCG | VEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.68% | -61.52% | +55.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.73% | -4.01% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.04% | -13.06% | +11.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.10% | — |
Volatility
BGCG vs. VEU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGCG | VEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.59% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.85% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.05% | 16.83% | +8.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.05% | 16.33% | +8.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.05% | 17.05% | +8.00% |
BGCG vs. VEU - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGCG has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than VEU's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
BGCG vs. VEU - Dividend Comparison
BGCG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGCG Baillie Gifford International Concentrated Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VEU Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF | 2.59% | 3.09% | 3.24% | 3.32% | 3.12% | 3.08% | 2.00% | 3.10% | 3.27% | 2.66% | 2.96% | 2.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BGCG and VEU have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VEU is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VEU is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for BGCG.
VEU has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 0.00% for BGCG.
They also come from different issuers: Baillie Gifford and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for BGCG and 0.04% for VEU.
Find the right allocation for BGCG and VEU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer