PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGB vs. OSTIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BGB vs. OSTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackstone GSO Strategic Credit Closed Fund (BGB) and Osterweis Strategic Income Fund (OSTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGB achieves a -1.48% return, which is significantly lower than OSTIX's 1.67% return. Over the past 10 years, BGB has outperformed OSTIX with an annualized return of 6.41%, while OSTIX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.13% annualized return.


BGB

1D
-0.44%
1M
0.83%
YTD
-1.48%
6M
-1.28%
1Y
2.64%
3Y*
12.45%
5Y*
5.03%
10Y*
6.41%

OSTIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.92%
YTD
1.67%
6M
2.19%
1Y
5.13%
3Y*
7.26%
5Y*
4.41%
10Y*
5.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGB vs. OSTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BGB
Blackstone GSO Strategic Credit Closed Fund
-1.48%4.80%18.69%19.50%-16.06%15.41%-4.69%17.07%-5.21%10.09%
OSTIX
Osterweis Strategic Income Fund
1.67%4.04%8.03%12.29%-5.94%5.48%9.01%5.36%-0.66%6.00%

Correlation

The correlation between BGB and OSTIX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2012

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BGB vs. OSTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGB
BGB Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGB Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGB Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

OSTIX
OSTIX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
OSTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OSTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
OSTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
OSTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
OSTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGB vs. OSTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackstone GSO Strategic Credit Closed Fund (BGB) and Osterweis Strategic Income Fund (OSTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BGBOSTIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.75

-0.68

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.29

3.70

-3.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.61

16.77

-16.15

BGB vs. OSTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGB Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the OSTIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGB and OSTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BGBOSTIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

3.10

-2.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

1.47

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

1.74

-1.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

2.35

-2.06

Drawdowns

BGB vs. OSTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGB drawdown since its inception was -44.87%, which is greater than OSTIX's maximum drawdown of -10.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGB and OSTIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGBOSTIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.87%

-10.06%

-34.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.06%

-1.42%

-7.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.77%

-3.27%

-9.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.23%

-9.75%

-11.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.87%

-10.06%

-34.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.83%

0.00%

-4.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.98%

-0.94%

-5.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.32%

0.31%

+4.01%

Volatility

BGB vs. OSTIX - Volatility Comparison

Blackstone GSO Strategic Credit Closed Fund (BGB) has a higher volatility of 1.90% compared to Osterweis Strategic Income Fund (OSTIX) at 0.52%. This indicates that BGB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OSTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGBOSTIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.90%

0.52%

+1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.61%

1.34%

+4.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.74%

1.69%

+6.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.93%

3.01%

+7.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.11%

2.96%

+13.15%

BGB vs. OSTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGB has a 2.36% expense ratio, which is higher than OSTIX's 0.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

BGB vs. OSTIX - Dividend Comparison

BGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.58%, more than OSTIX's 4.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGB
Blackstone GSO Strategic Credit Closed Fund
8.58%8.58%9.26%10.69%7.35%6.63%8.77%9.30%11.18%7.35%8.76%9.42%
OSTIX
Osterweis Strategic Income Fund
4.75%3.96%5.25%5.72%4.72%4.03%3.85%4.74%4.66%4.58%5.23%5.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


BGB and OSTIX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BGB has higher volatility (1.90%) compared to OSTIX (0.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGB dropped -44.87% vs OSTIX's -10.06%.

OSTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGB and OSTIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer