BSL vs. BGX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

BSL (Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund) and BGX (Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund) are both mutual funds - BSL is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Blackstone, while BGX is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Blackstone. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, BSL returned 5.84%/yr vs 6.32%/yr for BGX. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSL charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.46%/yr for BGX.

Performance

BSL vs. BGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund (BSL) and Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund (BGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSL achieves a -1.37% return, which is significantly higher than BGX's -4.25% return. Over the past 10 years, BSL has underperformed BGX with an annualized return of 5.84%, while BGX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.32% annualized return.

BSL

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -0.69%
• YTD: -1.37%
• 6M: -1.15%
• 1Y: -0.75%
• 3Y*: 11.13%
• 5Y*: 3.73%
• 10Y*: 5.84%

BGX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.81%
• YTD: -4.25%
• 6M: -3.97%
• 1Y: -2.93%
• 3Y*: 10.10%
• 5Y*: 3.49%
• 10Y*: 6.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSL vs. BGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BSL Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund	-1.37%	2.15%	18.16%	20.03%	-22.88%	28.33%	-4.44%	14.06%	-7.52%	5.74%
BGX Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund	-4.25%	2.09%	19.83%	18.92%	-20.57%	17.54%	-5.67%	24.98%	-4.19%	7.28%

Correlation

The correlation between BSL and BGX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2011	0.39

The correlation between BSL and BGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BSL vs. BGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSL

BSL Risk / Return Rank: 2
BSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BSL Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BSL Martin Ratio Rank: 2

BGX

BGX Risk / Return Rank: 1
BGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSL vs. BGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund (BSL) and Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund (BGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BSL	BGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.11	-0.37	+0.26
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.11	-0.48	+0.37
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	0.94	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.04	-0.20	+0.16
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.10	-0.43	+0.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BSL vs. BGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSL Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is higher than the BGX Sharpe Ratio of -0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSL and BGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BSL	BGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11	-0.37	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	0.30	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.36	0.36	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.28	+0.03

Drawdowns

BSL vs. BGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSL drawdown since its inception was -43.83%, smaller than the maximum BGX drawdown of -47.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSL and BGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSL	BGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.83%	-47.40%	+3.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.86%	-12.43%	+4.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.86%	-14.08%	+6.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.48%	-25.94%	+1.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.83%	-47.40%	+3.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.79%	-7.92%	+4.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.36%	-6.99%	-0.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.22%	5.86%	-2.64%

Volatility

BSL vs. BGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund (BSL) is 1.27%, while Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund (BGX) has a volatility of 1.63%. This indicates that BSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BSL	BGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.27%	1.63%	-0.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.22%	5.97%	-0.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.64%	7.99%	-1.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.52%	11.79%	-1.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.41%	17.54%	-1.13%

BSL vs. BGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BGX's 1.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

BSL vs. BGX - Dividend Comparison

BSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.40%, less than BGX's 9.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BGX Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund	9.03%	8.87%	9.89%	11.71%	8.15%	7.01%	8.76%	9.35%	11.74%	7.12%	9.01%	8.72%
BSL Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund	8.40%	8.45%	9.46%	10.76%	6.89%	5.75%	7.65%	8.15%	9.21%	5.93%	5.86%	7.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSL and BGX in my portfolio?

BSL and BGX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BSL or BGX?

BGX has higher volatility (1.63%) compared to BSL (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSL dropped -43.83% vs BGX's -47.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.11 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.