BGAIX vs. MBXAX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

BGAIX (Baron Global Advantage Fund) and MBXAX (Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund) are both mutual funds - BGAIX is a Global Equities fund managed by Baron Capital, while MBXAX is a Multistrategy fund managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. Over the past 10 years, BGAIX returned 15.03%/yr vs 7.59%/yr for MBXAX. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BGAIX charges 0.90%/yr vs 2.18%/yr for MBXAX.

Performance

BGAIX vs. MBXAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baron Global Advantage Fund (BGAIX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGAIX achieves a 10.58% return, which is significantly lower than MBXAX's 13.56% return. Over the past 10 years, BGAIX has outperformed MBXAX with an annualized return of 15.03%, while MBXAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.59% annualized return.

BGAIX

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: -6.59%
• 6M: 11.41%
• YTD: 10.58%
• 1Y: 26.70%
• 3Y*: 22.13%
• 5Y*: 0.43%
• 10Y*: 15.03%
• ALL TIME*: 13.05%

MBXAX

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: -1.32%
• 6M: 9.10%
• YTD: 13.56%
• 1Y: 18.00%
• 3Y*: 9.79%
• 5Y*: 7.27%
• 10Y*: 7.59%
• ALL TIME*: 8.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BGAIX Baron Global Advantage Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
MBXAX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

BGAIX vs. MBXAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BGAIX Baron Global Advantage Fund	10.58%	27.53%	26.42%	25.56%	-51.56%	0.90%	79.46%	45.45%	-3.66%	49.82%
MBXAX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund	13.56%	4.13%	13.17%	-0.91%	7.46%	16.62%	-0.72%	13.59%	-2.43%	13.69%

Correlation

The correlation between BGAIX and MBXAX is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.35
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.44

The correlation between BGAIX and MBXAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BGAIX vs. MBXAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BGAIX

BGAIX Risk / Return Rank: 37
BGAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
BGAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
BGAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
BGAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
BGAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 39

MBXAX

MBXAX Risk / Return Rank: 92
MBXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
MBXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
MBXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
MBXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
MBXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BGAIX vs. MBXAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Global Advantage Fund (BGAIX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BGAIX	MBXAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.03	2.36	-1.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.68	3.47	-1.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.44	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.11	4.17	-2.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.03	16.27	-10.24

BGAIX vs. MBXAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGAIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the MBXAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGAIX and MBXAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BGAIX vs. MBXAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGAIX drawdown since its inception was -61.14%, which is greater than MBXAX's maximum drawdown of -31.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGAIX and MBXAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BGAIX	MBXAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.14%	-31.75%	-29.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.50%	-3.89%	-7.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.52%	-15.66%	-10.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.14%	-15.66%	-45.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.14%	-31.75%	-29.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.97%	-1.98%	-7.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.91%	-4.00%	-12.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.02%	1.01%	+3.01%

Volatility

BGAIX vs. MBXAX - Volatility Comparison

Baron Global Advantage Fund (BGAIX) has a higher volatility of 6.35% compared to Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX) at 1.78%. This indicates that BGAIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBXAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BGAIX	MBXAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.35%	1.78%	+4.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.32%	4.91%	+12.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.67%	6.90%	+16.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.53%	11.39%	+19.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.90%	13.36%	+13.54%

BGAIX vs. MBXAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGAIX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than MBXAX's 2.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

BGAIX vs. MBXAX - Dividend Comparison

BGAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, while MBXAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BGAIX Baron Global Advantage Fund	0.17%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	1.98%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.42%
MBXAX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund	0.00%	0.00%	2.43%	2.02%	7.57%	0.00%	3.92%	4.96%	3.07%	3.35%	1.82%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BGAIX and MBXAX in my portfolio?

BGAIX and MBXAX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BGAIX or MBXAX?

BGAIX has higher volatility (6.35%) compared to MBXAX (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGAIX dropped -61.14% vs MBXAX's -31.75%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MBXAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.