PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BG vs. FTGC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BG vs. FTGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bunge Limited (BG) and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BG achieves a 20.66% return, which is significantly lower than FTGC's 27.22% return. Over the past 10 years, BG has outperformed FTGC with an annualized return of 8.51%, while FTGC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.01% annualized return.


BG

1D
1.10%
1M
1.28%
6M
-5.62%
YTD
20.66%
1Y
36.94%
3Y*
2.24%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
8.51%
ALL TIME*
10.10%

FTGC

1D
0.03%
1M
6.85%
6M
16.44%
YTD
27.22%
1Y
38.55%
3Y*
14.53%
5Y*
12.93%
10Y*
8.01%
ALL TIME*
3.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$168.20M$156.93M$196.43M
$15.55M$14.47M$23.37M

BG vs. FTGC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BG
Bunge Limited
20.66%18.56%-20.74%3.79%9.28%46.77%18.92%11.77%-17.99%-4.76%
FTGC
First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund
27.22%14.61%9.96%-5.36%17.36%27.95%2.17%6.40%-12.75%2.73%

Correlation

The correlation between BG and FTGC is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2013

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BG vs. FTGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BG
BG Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
BG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
BG Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
BG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
BG Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

FTGC
FTGC Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FTGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTGC Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FTGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTGC Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BG vs. FTGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bunge Limited (BG) and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BGFTGCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.42

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

3.14

-1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.72

10.32

-4.60

BG vs. FTGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BG Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the FTGC Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BG and FTGC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BG vs. FTGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BG drawdown since its inception was -77.34%, which is greater than FTGC's maximum drawdown of -59.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BG and FTGC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGFTGCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.34%

-59.47%

-17.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.18%

-12.34%

-7.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.82%

-12.34%

-26.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.49%

-22.64%

-18.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.49%

-35.91%

-24.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.16%

-4.60%

-14.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.79%

-27.17%

-1.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.47%

3.75%

+2.72%

Volatility

BG vs. FTGC - Volatility Comparison

Bunge Limited (BG) has a higher volatility of 12.25% compared to First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) at 4.34%. This indicates that BG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGFTGCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.25%

4.34%

+7.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.14%

13.35%

+8.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.79%

15.87%

+15.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.58%

15.71%

+13.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.10%

14.73%

+16.37%

Dividends

BG vs. FTGC - Dividend Comparison

BG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, less than FTGC's 15.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BG
Bunge Limited
2.65%3.12%3.48%2.55%2.31%2.76%3.05%3.48%3.59%2.62%2.21%2.11%
FTGC
First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund
15.23%17.74%3.05%3.34%10.35%7.21%0.00%0.81%0.80%1.21%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BG and FTGC have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BG has higher volatility (12.25%) compared to FTGC (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BG dropped -77.34% vs FTGC's -59.47%.

FTGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BG and FTGC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer