BG vs. FDVV
BG (Bunge Limited) is a stock, while FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Core Dividend Index. Over the past 5 years, BG returned 11.16%/yr vs 13.36%/yr for FDVV. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BG vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BG achieves a 49.26% return, which is significantly higher than FDVV's 8.39% return.
BG
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- 3.59%
- YTD
- 49.26%
- 6M
- 39.53%
- 1Y
- 77.15%
- 3Y*
- 15.81%
- 5Y*
- 11.16%
- 10Y*
- 10.10%
FDVV
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 4.44%
- YTD
- 8.39%
- 6M
- 8.67%
- 1Y
- 23.45%
- 3Y*
- 20.08%
- 5Y*
- 13.36%
- 10Y*
- —
BG vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BG Bunge Limited | 49.26% | 18.56% | -20.74% | 3.79% | 9.28% | 46.77% | 18.92% | 11.77% | -17.99% | -4.76% |
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 8.39% | 17.08% | 21.81% | 18.00% | -4.21% | 29.24% | 2.80% | 24.07% | -1.26% | 14.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between BG and FDVV is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BG and FDVV has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BG vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank
BG
FDVV
BG vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bunge Limited (BG) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BG | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.43 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.04 | 2.53 | +2.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.09 | 10.54 | +3.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BG | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48 | 2.35 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.91 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.79 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
BG vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BG drawdown since its inception was -77.34%, which is greater than FDVV's maximum drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BG and FDVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BG | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.34% | -40.25% | -37.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.39% | -9.30% | -6.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.82% | -15.90% | -22.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.49% | -20.18% | -21.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.12% | +1.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.91% | -3.81% | -25.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.50% | 2.23% | +3.27% |
Volatility
BG vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison
Bunge Limited (BG) has a higher volatility of 8.83% compared to Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) at 3.14%. This indicates that BG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BG | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.83% | 3.14% | +5.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.24% | 7.99% | +11.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.41% | 10.06% | +21.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.26% | 14.75% | +14.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.99% | 17.00% | +13.99% |
Dividends
BG vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison
BG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, less than FDVV's 2.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BG Bunge Limited | 2.15% | 3.12% | 3.48% | 2.55% | 2.31% | 2.76% | 3.05% | 3.48% | 3.59% | 2.62% | 2.21% | 2.11% |
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 2.72% | 2.89% | 2.94% | 3.77% | 3.44% | 2.70% | 3.19% | 3.93% | 4.05% | 3.66% | 1.04% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BG and FDVV have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BG has higher volatility (8.83%) compared to FDVV (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BG dropped -77.34% vs FDVV's -40.25%.
BG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BG and FDVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer