BFRZ vs. CSHP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BFRZ (Innovator Equity Managed 100 Buffer ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BFRZ is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BFRZ returned 8.04% vs 3.96% for CSHP. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. BFRZ charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.

Performance

BFRZ vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Managed 100 Buffer ETF (BFRZ) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFRZ achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly lower than CSHP's 1.63% return.

BFRZ

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 2.76%
• YTD: 1.49%
• 6M: 1.75%
• 1Y: 8.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSHP

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.63%
• 6M: 1.93%
• 1Y: 3.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFRZ vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BFRZ Innovator Equity Managed 100 Buffer ETF	1.49%	7.39%
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	1.63%	2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between BFRZ and CSHP is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025	-0.10

Return for Risk

BFRZ vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFRZ

BFRZ Risk / Return Rank: 48
BFRZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
BFRZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
BFRZ Omega Ratio Rank: 51
BFRZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
BFRZ Martin Ratio Rank: 45

CSHP

CSHP Risk / Return Rank: 100
CSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFRZ vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Managed 100 Buffer ETF (BFRZ) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BFRZ	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.62	11.91	-10.29
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.21	31.26	-29.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	7.44	-6.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.59	65.71	-63.12
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.31	432.16	-424.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BFRZ vs. CSHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFRZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is lower than the CSHP Sharpe Ratio of 11.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFRZ and CSHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BFRZ	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.62	11.91	-10.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.75	10.75	-9.00

Drawdowns

BFRZ vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFRZ drawdown since its inception was -3.12%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFRZ and CSHP.

Drawdown Indicators

	BFRZ	CSHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.12%	-0.08%	-3.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.12%	-0.06%	-3.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.42%	0.00%	-0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.66%	-0.00%	-0.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.10%	0.01%	+1.09%

Volatility

BFRZ vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Equity Managed 100 Buffer ETF (BFRZ) has a higher volatility of 1.16% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.07%. This indicates that BFRZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BFRZ	CSHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.16%	0.07%	+1.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.72%	0.24%	+3.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.99%	0.33%	+4.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.88%	0.40%	+4.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.88%	0.40%	+4.48%

BFRZ vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFRZ has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

BFRZ vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison

BFRZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than CSHP's 3.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BFRZ Innovator Equity Managed 100 Buffer ETF	0.26%	0.20%	0.00%
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	3.92%	5.39%	1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BFRZ and CSHP in my portfolio?

BFRZ and CSHP have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BFRZ or CSHP?

BFRZ has higher volatility (1.16%) compared to CSHP (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFRZ dropped -3.12% vs CSHP's -0.08%.

Which ETF is better, BFRZ or CSHP?

On 1-year performance, BFRZ leads with 8.04% vs 3.96% for CSHP. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BFRZ or CSHP?

Over the 1-year period, BFRZ has performed better with a 8.04% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BFRZ or CSHP?

CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BFRZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BFRZ or CSHP?

CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.92%, compared with 0.26% for BFRZ.

What is the main difference between BFRZ and CSHP?

BFRZ is categorized as Defined Outcome, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for BFRZ and 0.20% for CSHP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.91 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.