PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFRAX vs. SRLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BFRAX vs. SRLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Floating Rate Income Fund (BFRAX) and SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFRAX achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly higher than SRLN's 0.68% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BFRAX having a 4.32% annualized return and SRLN not far ahead at 4.52%.


BFRAX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.40%
YTD
0.75%
6M
1.46%
1Y
4.36%
3Y*
6.84%
5Y*
4.75%
10Y*
4.32%

SRLN

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.68%
6M
1.43%
1Y
5.57%
3Y*
7.88%
5Y*
4.62%
10Y*
4.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFRAX vs. SRLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BFRAX
BlackRock Floating Rate Income Fund
0.75%5.35%8.12%9.94%-1.43%3.59%2.39%8.60%-0.74%3.10%
SRLN
SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF
0.68%6.77%8.43%11.62%-5.30%4.49%3.13%10.03%-0.66%3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between BFRAX and SRLN is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2013

0.41

The correlation between BFRAX and SRLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (all time) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFRAX vs. SRLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFRAX
BFRAX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
BFRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
BFRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

SRLN
SRLN Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SRLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SRLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRLN Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFRAX vs. SRLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Floating Rate Income Fund (BFRAX) and SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BFRAXSRLNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.96

1.94

+0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.11

2.82

+1.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.44

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

1.71

+1.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.13

6.35

+2.78

BFRAX vs. SRLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFRAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the SRLN Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFRAX and SRLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BFRAXSRLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

1.94

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.71

1.19

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.10

0.75

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.70

-0.32

Drawdowns

BFRAX vs. SRLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFRAX drawdown since its inception was -44.69%, which is greater than SRLN's maximum drawdown of -22.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFRAX and SRLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFRAXSRLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.69%

-22.29%

-22.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.70%

-3.26%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.81%

-4.26%

+1.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.43%

-7.93%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.61%

-22.29%

+1.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.12%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.79%

-1.10%

-5.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.54%

0.88%

-0.34%

Volatility

BFRAX vs. SRLN - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Floating Rate Income Fund (BFRAX) has a higher volatility of 0.61% compared to SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) at 0.44%. This indicates that BFRAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFRAXSRLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.61%

0.44%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.73%

2.64%

-0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24%

2.89%

-0.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.79%

3.91%

-1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.95%

6.06%

-2.11%

BFRAX vs. SRLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFRAX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SRLN's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

BFRAX vs. SRLN - Dividend Comparison

BFRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.45%, less than SRLN's 7.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BFRAX
BlackRock Floating Rate Income Fund
6.45%6.68%8.00%6.24%4.09%2.91%3.81%4.65%4.58%3.45%3.90%4.02%
SRLN
SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF
7.49%7.67%8.58%8.44%5.72%4.45%4.91%5.39%4.98%4.01%3.94%4.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


BFRAX and SRLN have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BFRAX has higher volatility (0.61%) compared to SRLN (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFRAX dropped -44.69% vs SRLN's -22.29%.

BFRAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFRAX and SRLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer