PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFONX vs. SWLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BFONX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Biondo Focus Fund (BFONX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFONX achieves a -8.28% return, which is significantly lower than SWLGX's 3.19% return.


BFONX

1D
-1.46%
1M
-2.73%
YTD
-8.28%
6M
-9.34%
1Y
6.05%
3Y*
14.84%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*
15.23%

SWLGX

1D
-1.26%
1M
-2.48%
YTD
3.19%
6M
1.92%
1Y
19.96%
3Y*
22.61%
5Y*
13.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFONX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BFONX
Biondo Focus Fund
-8.28%11.33%37.94%37.37%-35.33%6.40%30.47%36.65%6.37%-1.12%
SWLGX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
3.19%18.55%33.30%42.67%-29.17%27.55%38.43%36.30%-1.59%-0.60%

Correlation

The correlation between BFONX and SWLGX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2017

0.89

The correlation between BFONX and SWLGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFONX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFONX
BFONX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
BFONX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFONX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFONX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
BFONX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFONX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

SWLGX
SWLGX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
SWLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
SWLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFONX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Biondo Focus Fund (BFONX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BFONXSWLGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.23

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.40

1.32

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.07

4.34

-3.28

BFONX vs. SWLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFONX Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the SWLGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFONX and SWLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BFONX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFONX drawdown since its inception was -48.30%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFONX and SWLGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFONXSWLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.30%

-32.69%

-15.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.92%

-16.16%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.20%

-23.30%

-12.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.30%

-32.69%

-15.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.09%

-5.34%

-11.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.84%

-7.04%

-6.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.77%

4.91%

+1.86%

Volatility

BFONX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison

Biondo Focus Fund (BFONX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) have volatilities of 5.80% and 5.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFONXSWLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.80%

5.91%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.03%

12.60%

+0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.20%

16.21%

+0.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.62%

21.61%

+6.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.95%

22.68%

+3.27%

BFONX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFONX has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

BFONX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison

BFONX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.19%, more than SWLGX's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BFONX
Biondo Focus Fund
13.19%12.10%18.35%9.23%1.67%8.06%5.27%18.68%6.82%13.00%
SWLGX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
0.44%0.46%0.52%0.67%0.93%1.76%0.67%0.96%1.03%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BFONX and SWLGX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SWLGX has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to BFONX (5.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFONX dropped -48.30% vs SWLGX's -32.69%.

SWLGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFONX and SWLGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer