BFOCX vs. SHGTX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

BFOCX (Berkshire Focus Fund) and SHGTX (Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund) are both Technology Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, BFOCX returned 23.09%/yr vs 28.01%/yr for SHGTX. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BFOCX charges 1.94%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for SHGTX.

Performance

BFOCX vs. SHGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Berkshire Focus Fund (BFOCX) and Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund (SHGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFOCX achieves a 55.82% return, which is significantly higher than SHGTX's 52.60% return. Over the past 10 years, BFOCX has underperformed SHGTX with an annualized return of 23.09%, while SHGTX has yielded a comparatively higher 28.01% annualized return.

BFOCX

• 1D: -8.12%
• 1M: 6.16%
• YTD: 55.82%
• 6M: 51.12%
• 1Y: 79.70%
• 3Y*: 49.98%
• 5Y*: 10.52%
• 10Y*: 23.09%

SHGTX

• 1D: -3.56%
• 1M: 4.21%
• YTD: 52.60%
• 6M: 49.84%
• 1Y: 102.06%
• 3Y*: 44.15%
• 5Y*: 24.24%
• 10Y*: 28.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFOCX vs. SHGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BFOCX Berkshire Focus Fund	55.82%	28.67%	59.16%	50.20%	-65.06%	-1.79%	90.81%	40.56%	10.04%	44.10%
SHGTX Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund	52.60%	35.09%	26.04%	45.28%	-31.70%	38.60%	45.56%	54.92%	-8.70%	34.52%

Correlation

The correlation between BFOCX and SHGTX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 1997	0.80

The correlation between BFOCX and SHGTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BFOCX vs. SHGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFOCX

BFOCX Risk / Return Rank: 64
BFOCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
BFOCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
BFOCX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
BFOCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
BFOCX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

SHGTX

SHGTX Risk / Return Rank: 95
SHGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
SHGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
SHGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
SHGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
SHGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFOCX vs. SHGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Berkshire Focus Fund (BFOCX) and Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund (SHGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BFOCX	SHGTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	3.85	-1.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	4.16	-1.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.56	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.01	8.67	-3.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.72	30.91	-17.19

BFOCX vs. SHGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFOCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is lower than the SHGTX Sharpe Ratio of 3.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFOCX and SHGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BFOCX vs. SHGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFOCX drawdown since its inception was -95.80%, which is greater than SHGTX's maximum drawdown of -77.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFOCX and SHGTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BFOCX	SHGTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.80%	-77.47%	-18.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.22%	-12.45%	-4.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-40.55%	-28.90%	-11.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-72.53%	-43.17%	-29.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-72.53%	-43.17%	-29.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.12%	-3.64%	-4.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-58.07%	-24.90%	-33.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.28%	3.48%	+2.80%

Volatility

BFOCX vs. SHGTX - Volatility Comparison

Berkshire Focus Fund (BFOCX) has a higher volatility of 22.24% compared to Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund (SHGTX) at 12.17%. This indicates that BFOCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BFOCX	SHGTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.24%	12.17%	+10.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.99%	22.03%	+12.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.93%	28.04%	+13.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.46%	27.83%	+16.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.10%	26.94%	+11.16%

BFOCX vs. SHGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFOCX has a 1.94% expense ratio, which is higher than SHGTX's 1.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

BFOCX vs. SHGTX - Dividend Comparison

BFOCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SHGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BFOCX Berkshire Focus Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	19.54%	21.20%	14.20%	5.70%	21.73%	0.14%	9.52%
SHGTX Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund	5.54%	8.45%	14.04%	6.22%	3.94%	11.77%	9.92%	10.26%	12.75%	7.25%	8.13%	8.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BFOCX and SHGTX in my portfolio?

BFOCX and SHGTX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BFOCX or SHGTX?

BFOCX has higher volatility (22.24%) compared to SHGTX (12.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFOCX dropped -95.80% vs SHGTX's -77.47%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SHGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.85 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.