PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFOC vs. PBFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BFOC vs. PBFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFOC achieves a -7.39% return, which is significantly lower than PBFR's 4.52% return.


BFOC

1D
-0.24%
1M
-2.82%
YTD
-7.39%
6M
-9.28%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PBFR

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.58%
YTD
4.52%
6M
5.34%
1Y
12.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFOC vs. PBFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BFOC and PBFR is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFOC vs. PBFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFOC

PBFR
PBFR Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PBFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBFR Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
PBFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBFR Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFOC vs. PBFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BFOC vs. PBFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BFOCPBFRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.88

1.54

-3.42

Drawdowns

BFOC vs. PBFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFOC drawdown since its inception was -18.20%, which is greater than PBFR's maximum drawdown of -8.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFOC and PBFR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFOCPBFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.20%

-8.50%

-9.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.20%

-0.16%

-18.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.52%

-0.63%

-11.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.53%

Volatility

BFOC vs. PBFR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFOCPBFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.61%

4.33%

+8.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.61%

6.89%

+5.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.61%

6.89%

+5.72%

BFOC vs. PBFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFOC has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than PBFR's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

BFOC vs. PBFR - Dividend Comparison

BFOC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PBFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


PositionTTM20252024
BFOC
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October
0.00%0.00%0.00%
PBFR
PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF
0.01%0.01%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


BFOC and PBFR have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PBFR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PBFR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFOC.

PBFR has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for BFOC.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFOC and 0.50% for PBFR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFOC and PBFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer