BFOC vs. PBFR
BFOC (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October) and PBFR (PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BFOC charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PBFR.
Performance
BFOC vs. PBFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFOC achieves a -7.39% return, which is significantly lower than PBFR's 4.52% return.
BFOC
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -2.82%
- YTD
- -7.39%
- 6M
- -9.28%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBFR
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- YTD
- 4.52%
- 6M
- 5.34%
- 1Y
- 12.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BFOC vs. PBFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | -7.39% | -9.76% |
PBFR PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF | 4.52% | 2.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between BFOC and PBFR is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BFOC vs. PBFR — Risk / Return Rank
BFOC
PBFR
BFOC vs. PBFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BFOC | PBFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.88 | 1.54 | -3.42 |
Drawdowns
BFOC vs. PBFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFOC drawdown since its inception was -18.20%, which is greater than PBFR's maximum drawdown of -8.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFOC and PBFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFOC | PBFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.20% | -8.50% | -9.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.20% | -0.16% | -18.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.52% | -0.63% | -11.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.53% | — |
Volatility
BFOC vs. PBFR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BFOC | PBFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.64% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.34% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.61% | 4.33% | +8.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.61% | 6.89% | +5.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.61% | 6.89% | +5.72% |
BFOC vs. PBFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
BFOC has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than PBFR's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
BFOC vs. PBFR - Dividend Comparison
BFOC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PBFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PBFR PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BFOC and PBFR have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBFR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBFR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFOC.
PBFR has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for BFOC.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFOC and 0.50% for PBFR.
Find the right allocation for BFOC and PBFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer