BFOC vs. FETH

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BFOC (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October) and FETH (Fidelity Ethereum Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - BFOC is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust, while FETH is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index. BFOC is actively managed, while FETH is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BFOC charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FETH.

Performance

BFOC vs. FETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFOC achieves a -7.46% return, which is significantly higher than FETH's -37.25% return.

BFOC

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: -0.60%
• 6M: -6.08%
• YTD: -7.46%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

FETH

• 1D: -2.98%
• 1M: 9.68%
• 6M: -30.28%
• YTD: -37.25%
• 1Y: -46.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -26.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October	$37.88K	$50.79K	$63.29K
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund	$29.89M	$30.47M	$35.49M

BFOC vs. FETH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October	-7.46%	-9.75%
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund	-37.25%	-28.74%

Correlation

The correlation between BFOC and FETH is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025	0.82

Return for Risk

BFOC vs. FETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BFOC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FETH

FETH Risk / Return Rank: 3
FETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
FETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
FETH Omega Ratio Rank: 4
FETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
FETH Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BFOC vs. FETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BFOC	FETH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.75	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-0.98	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.89	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.74	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.11	—

Drawdowns

BFOC vs. FETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFOC drawdown since its inception was -18.41%, smaller than the maximum FETH drawdown of -67.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFOC and FETH.

Drawdown Indicators

	BFOC	FETH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.41%	-67.94%	+49.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-67.94%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.26%	-61.61%	+43.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.50%	-35.25%	+21.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	45.45%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BFOC	FETH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	13.14%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	45.81%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.68%	67.25%	-55.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.68%	71.23%	-59.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.68%	71.23%	-59.55%

BFOC vs. FETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFOC has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FETH's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

BFOC vs. FETH - Dividend Comparison

Neither BFOC nor FETH has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BFOC and FETH in my portfolio?

BFOC and FETH have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BFOC or FETH?

On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BFOC or FETH?

FETH is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFOC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BFOC or FETH?

BFOC and FETH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BFOC and FETH?

BFOC is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FETH is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFOC and 0.25% for FETH.