PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFOC vs. FETH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BFOC vs. FETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFOC achieves a -7.39% return, which is significantly higher than FETH's -39.45% return.


BFOC

1D
-0.24%
1M
-2.82%
YTD
-7.39%
6M
-9.28%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FETH

1D
-5.78%
1M
-23.67%
YTD
-39.45%
6M
-42.77%
1Y
-31.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFOC vs. FETH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BFOC
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October
-7.39%-9.76%
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
-39.45%-31.63%

Correlation

The correlation between BFOC and FETH is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025

0.87

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFOC vs. FETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFOC

FETH
FETH Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FETH Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FETH Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFOC vs. FETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BFOC vs. FETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BFOCFETHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.88

-0.41

-1.46

Drawdowns

BFOC vs. FETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFOC drawdown since its inception was -18.20%, smaller than the maximum FETH drawdown of -64.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFOC and FETH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFOCFETHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.20%

-64.00%

+45.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-62.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.20%

-62.95%

+44.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.52%

-32.73%

+20.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.82%

Volatility

BFOC vs. FETH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFOCFETHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.61%

68.50%

-55.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.61%

72.27%

-59.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.61%

72.27%

-59.66%

BFOC vs. FETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFOC has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FETH's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

BFOC vs. FETH - Dividend Comparison

Neither BFOC nor FETH has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BFOC and FETH have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FETH is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFOC.

BFOC and FETH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BFOC is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FETH is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFOC and 0.00% for FETH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFOC and FETH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer