BFOC vs. ARKB
BFOC (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October) and ARKB (ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BFOC is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust, while ARKB is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. BFOC is actively managed, while ARKB is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BFOC charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for ARKB.
Performance
BFOC vs. ARKB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFOC achieves a -7.09% return, which is significantly higher than ARKB's -25.79% return.
BFOC
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- 6M
- -10.22%
- YTD
- -7.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKB
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -2.44%
- 6M
- -33.61%
- YTD
- -25.79%
- 1Y
- -44.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BFOC vs. ARKB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | -7.09% | -9.75% |
ARKB ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF | -25.79% | -23.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between BFOC and ARKB is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BFOC vs. ARKB — Risk / Return Rank
BFOC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ARKB
BFOC vs. ARKB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC) and ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BFOC | ARKB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.84 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.83 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.35 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BFOC vs. ARKB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFOC drawdown since its inception was -18.41%, smaller than the maximum ARKB drawdown of -53.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFOC and ARKB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFOC | ARKB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.41% | -53.33% | +34.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -53.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.93% | -48.32% | +30.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.23% | -17.69% | +4.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 32.96% | — |
Volatility
BFOC vs. ARKB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BFOC | ARKB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.73% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 34.86% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.94% | 44.29% | -32.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.94% | 49.78% | -37.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.94% | 49.78% | -37.84% |
BFOC vs. ARKB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BFOC has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than ARKB's 0.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
BFOC vs. ARKB - Dividend Comparison
Neither BFOC nor ARKB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BFOC and ARKB have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARKB is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARKB is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFOC.
BFOC and ARKB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BFOC is categorized as Defined Outcome, while ARKB is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFOC and 0.21% for ARKB.
Find the right allocation for BFOC and ARKB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer