PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFMSX vs. VTCLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BFMSX vs. VTCLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Low Duration Bond Portfolio (BFMSX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares (VTCLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFMSX achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly lower than VTCLX's 9.27% return. Over the past 10 years, BFMSX has underperformed VTCLX with an annualized return of 2.23%, while VTCLX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.86% annualized return.


BFMSX

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.22%
6M
0.37%
YTD
0.86%
1Y
3.19%
3Y*
5.02%
5Y*
2.10%
10Y*
2.23%
ALL TIME*
3.35%

VTCLX

1D
1.63%
1M
-0.80%
6M
7.72%
YTD
9.27%
1Y
20.40%
3Y*
18.54%
5Y*
11.93%
10Y*
14.86%
ALL TIME*
10.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BFMSX vs. VTCLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BFMSX
BlackRock Low Duration Bond Portfolio
0.86%6.20%4.94%4.96%-5.34%-0.33%3.47%4.75%1.15%1.98%
VTCLX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares
9.27%17.44%23.76%26.62%-19.07%26.87%21.08%31.47%-4.98%22.40%

Correlation

The correlation between BFMSX and VTCLX is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2001

-0.05

The correlation between BFMSX and VTCLX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFMSX vs. VTCLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BFMSX
BFMSX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
BFMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
BFMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

VTCLX
VTCLX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
VTCLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTCLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTCLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
VTCLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTCLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BFMSX vs. VTCLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Low Duration Bond Portfolio (BFMSX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares (VTCLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BFMSXVTCLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.25

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

2.07

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.61

8.96

+2.65

BFMSX vs. VTCLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFMSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the VTCLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFMSX and VTCLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BFMSX vs. VTCLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFMSX drawdown since its inception was -12.70%, smaller than the maximum VTCLX drawdown of -55.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFMSX and VTCLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFMSXVTCLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.70%

-55.18%

+42.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.52%

-8.79%

+7.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.52%

-19.01%

+17.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.96%

-24.98%

+17.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.96%

-34.56%

+26.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-1.83%

+1.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.82%

-7.53%

+6.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

2.02%

-1.68%

Volatility

BFMSX vs. VTCLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Low Duration Bond Portfolio (BFMSX) is 0.45%, while Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares (VTCLX) has a volatility of 3.41%. This indicates that BFMSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTCLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFMSXVTCLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.45%

3.41%

-2.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.75%

10.16%

-8.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15%

12.97%

-10.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.37%

17.33%

-14.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.12%

18.27%

-16.15%

BFMSX vs. VTCLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFMSX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than VTCLX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

BFMSX vs. VTCLX - Dividend Comparison

BFMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, more than VTCLX's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BFMSX
BlackRock Low Duration Bond Portfolio
4.27%4.56%4.14%3.34%2.67%1.23%2.04%2.63%2.51%2.17%1.76%1.87%
VTCLX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares
0.91%0.93%1.04%1.24%1.47%1.04%1.32%1.52%1.83%1.57%1.76%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


BFMSX and VTCLX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTCLX has higher volatility (3.41%) compared to BFMSX (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFMSX dropped -12.70% vs VTCLX's -55.18%.

BFMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFMSX and VTCLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer