BFLX vs. HTUS
BFLX (iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF) and HTUS (Hull Tactical US ETF) are both Long-Short funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BFLX charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for HTUS.
Performance
BFLX vs. HTUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BFLX
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -1.16%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HTUS
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 10.53%
- YTD
- 11.11%
- 1Y
- 22.67%
- 3Y*
- 20.01%
- 5Y*
- 14.74%
- 10Y*
- 12.42%
BFLX vs. HTUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BFLX iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF | 0.50% |
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 2.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between BFLX and HTUS is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2026 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BFLX vs. HTUS — Risk / Return Rank
BFLX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HTUS
BFLX vs. HTUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF (BFLX) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BFLX | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.36 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.62 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.68 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BFLX vs. HTUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFLX drawdown since its inception was -3.85%, smaller than the maximum HTUS drawdown of -47.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFLX and HTUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFLX | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.85% | -47.50% | +43.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.25% | -0.74% | -1.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.37% | -4.03% | +2.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.79% | — |
Volatility
BFLX vs. HTUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BFLX | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.90% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.09% | 12.05% | +2.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.09% | 19.10% | -5.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.09% | 21.49% | -7.40% |
BFLX vs. HTUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
BFLX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HTUS's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
BFLX vs. HTUS - Dividend Comparison
BFLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HTUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.70%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFLX iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 10.70% | 11.89% | 17.80% | 1.18% | 5.63% | 7.20% | 3.77% | 0.92% | 8.69% | 8.29% | 3.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BFLX and HTUS have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BFLX is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BFLX is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for HTUS.
HTUS has the higher dividend yield at 10.70%, compared with 0.00% for BFLX.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BFLX and 0.97% for HTUS.
Find the right allocation for BFLX and HTUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer