BFLX vs. CLIX

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

BFLX (iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF) and CLIX (ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF) are both Long-Short funds. BFLX is actively managed, while CLIX is passively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BFLX charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CLIX.

Performance

BFLX vs. CLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF (BFLX) and ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BFLX

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: -2.64%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

CLIX

• 1D: 1.11%
• 1M: 4.75%
• 6M: -3.34%
• YTD: -2.18%
• 1Y: 10.49%
• 3Y*: 17.15%
• 5Y*: -5.87%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFLX vs. CLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BFLX iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF	-0.41%
CLIX ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF	3.38%

Correlation

The correlation between BFLX and CLIX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2026	0.30

Return for Risk

BFLX vs. CLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFLX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CLIX

CLIX Risk / Return Rank: 19
CLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
CLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
CLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 19
CLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
CLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFLX vs. CLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF (BFLX) and ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BFLX	CLIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.48	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.79	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.09	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.54	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	1.32	—

Drawdowns

BFLX vs. CLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFLX drawdown since its inception was -3.85%, smaller than the maximum CLIX drawdown of -73.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFLX and CLIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BFLX	CLIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.85%	-73.21%	+69.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-19.57%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.18%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-66.03%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.14%	-42.22%	+39.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.45%	-34.83%	+33.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	7.98%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BFLX	CLIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.34%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	16.93%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.83%	21.88%	-8.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.83%	26.86%	-13.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.83%	25.88%	-12.05%

BFLX vs. CLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFLX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CLIX's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

BFLX vs. CLIX - Dividend Comparison

BFLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BFLX iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CLIX ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF	0.54%	0.46%	0.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BFLX and CLIX in my portfolio?

BFLX and CLIX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BFLX or CLIX?

On fees, BFLX is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BFLX or CLIX?

BFLX is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CLIX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BFLX or CLIX?

CLIX has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.00% for BFLX.

What is the main difference between BFLX and CLIX?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BFLX and 0.65% for CLIX.