BFLB vs. EAPR
BFLB (BufferLABS US Equity Dynamic Buffer ETF) and EAPR (Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. BFLB is actively managed, while EAPR is passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BFLB charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for EAPR.
Performance
BFLB vs. EAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BFLB having a 7.20% return and EAPR slightly higher at 7.42%.
BFLB
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- 6M
- 6.26%
- YTD
- 7.20%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EAPR
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -2.82%
- 6M
- 6.64%
- YTD
- 7.42%
- 1Y
- 12.78%
- 3Y*
- 8.35%
- 5Y*
- 4.74%
- 10Y*
- —
BFLB vs. EAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BFLB BufferLABS US Equity Dynamic Buffer ETF | 7.20% | 1.82% |
EAPR Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April | 7.42% | 1.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between BFLB and EAPR is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BFLB vs. EAPR — Risk / Return Rank
BFLB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EAPR
BFLB vs. EAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BufferLABS US Equity Dynamic Buffer ETF (BFLB) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BFLB | EAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.96 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.74 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BFLB vs. EAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFLB drawdown since its inception was -5.14%, smaller than the maximum EAPR drawdown of -17.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFLB and EAPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFLB | EAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.14% | -17.65% | +12.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -4.34% | +4.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.72% | -4.02% | +3.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.01% | — |
Volatility
BFLB vs. EAPR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BFLB | EAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.59% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.77% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.57% | 9.19% | -1.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.57% | 10.40% | -2.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.57% | 10.25% | -2.68% |
BFLB vs. EAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
BFLB has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than EAPR's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
BFLB vs. EAPR - Dividend Comparison
Neither BFLB nor EAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BFLB and EAPR have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BFLB is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BFLB is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EAPR.
BFLB and EAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: BufferLABS and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BFLB and 0.89% for EAPR.
Find the right allocation for BFLB and EAPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer