BFJL vs. TDIV
BFJL (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July) and TDIV (First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - BFJL is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust, while TDIV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BFJL charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TDIV.
Performance
BFJL vs. TDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFJL achieves a -7.59% return, which is significantly lower than TDIV's 19.03% return.
BFJL
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- YTD
- -7.59%
- 6M
- -8.01%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDIV
- 1D
- -2.33%
- 1M
- -0.89%
- YTD
- 19.03%
- 6M
- 18.00%
- 1Y
- 33.98%
- 3Y*
- 28.59%
- 5Y*
- 17.24%
- 10Y*
- 18.56%
BFJL vs. TDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BFJL FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July | -7.59% | -7.43% |
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund | 19.03% | 8.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between BFJL and TDIV is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BFJL vs. TDIV — Risk / Return Rank
BFJL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TDIV
BFJL vs. TDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July (BFJL) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BFJL | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.01 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.56 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BFJL vs. TDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFJL drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, smaller than the maximum TDIV drawdown of -31.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFJL and TDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFJL | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.27% | -31.97% | +10.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.12% | -10.47% | -10.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.21% | -4.85% | -7.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.98% | — |
Volatility
BFJL vs. TDIV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BFJL | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.50% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.37% | 20.02% | -6.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.37% | 20.97% | -7.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.37% | 20.96% | -7.59% |
BFJL vs. TDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
BFJL has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than TDIV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
BFJL vs. TDIV - Dividend Comparison
BFJL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, more than TDIV's 1.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFJL FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July | 1.46% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund | 1.22% | 1.40% | 1.59% | 1.74% | 2.51% | 1.76% | 2.07% | 2.27% | 2.97% | 2.27% | 2.45% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BFJL and TDIV have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TDIV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TDIV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFJL.
BFJL has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 1.22% for TDIV.
BFJL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while TDIV is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFJL and 0.50% for TDIV.
Find the right allocation for BFJL and TDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer