PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFJL vs. PMFB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BFJL vs. PMFB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July (BFJL) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - February (PMFB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFJL achieves a -7.67% return, which is significantly lower than PMFB's 2.56% return.


BFJL

1D
0.09%
1M
-1.12%
YTD
-7.67%
6M
-10.43%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PMFB

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.80%
YTD
2.56%
6M
3.26%
1Y
8.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFJL vs. PMFB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BFJL and PMFB is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFJL vs. PMFB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFJL

PMFB
PMFB Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
PMFB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMFB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMFB Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
PMFB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMFB Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFJL vs. PMFB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July (BFJL) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - February (PMFB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BFJL vs. PMFB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BFJLPMFBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.14

2.43

-3.58

Drawdowns

BFJL vs. PMFB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFJL drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, which is greater than PMFB's maximum drawdown of -2.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFJL and PMFB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFJLPMFBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.27%

-2.94%

-18.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.20%

-0.06%

-21.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.76%

-0.37%

-11.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.26%

Volatility

BFJL vs. PMFB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFJLPMFBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.76%

2.12%

+11.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.76%

2.77%

+10.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.76%

2.77%

+10.99%

BFJL vs. PMFB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFJL has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than PMFB's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

BFJL vs. PMFB - Dividend Comparison

BFJL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, while PMFB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


BFJL and PMFB have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PMFB is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PMFB is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFJL.

BFJL has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 0.00% for PMFB.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFJL and 0.50% for PMFB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFJL and PMFB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer