BFJL vs. EAPR

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

BFJL (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July) and EAPR (Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BFJL charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for EAPR.

Performance

BFJL vs. EAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July (BFJL) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFJL achieves a -7.75% return, which is significantly lower than EAPR's 11.89% return.

BFJL

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -0.98%
• YTD: -7.75%
• 6M: -9.79%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EAPR

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 2.45%
• YTD: 11.89%
• 6M: 12.71%
• 1Y: 22.51%
• 3Y*: 10.78%
• 5Y*: 5.35%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFJL vs. EAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BFJL FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July	-7.75%	-7.43%
EAPR Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April	11.89%	6.00%

Correlation

The correlation between BFJL and EAPR is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025	0.32

Return for Risk

BFJL vs. EAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAPR

EAPR Risk / Return Rank: 95
EAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
EAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
EAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 97
EAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
EAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFJL vs. EAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July (BFJL) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BFJL	EAPR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.13	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.15	0.55	-1.70

Drawdowns

BFJL vs. EAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFJL drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, which is greater than EAPR's maximum drawdown of -17.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFJL and EAPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BFJL	EAPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.27%	-17.65%	-3.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.02%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-10.24%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.27%	0.00%	-21.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.72%	-4.07%	-7.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.52%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BFJL	EAPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.75%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	6.25%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.79%	7.22%	+6.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.79%	10.09%	+3.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.79%	10.02%	+3.77%

BFJL vs. EAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFJL has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than EAPR's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

BFJL vs. EAPR - Dividend Comparison

BFJL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, while EAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BFJL FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July	1.46%	1.35%
EAPR Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BFJL and EAPR in my portfolio?

BFJL and EAPR have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BFJL or EAPR?

On fees, EAPR is cheaper at 0.89% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BFJL or EAPR?

EAPR is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFJL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BFJL or EAPR?

BFJL has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 0.00% for EAPR.

What is the main difference between BFJL and EAPR?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFJL and 0.89% for EAPR.