PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFJL vs. JANB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BFJL vs. JANB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July (BFJL) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFJL achieves a -7.67% return, which is significantly lower than JANB's 6.08% return.


BFJL

1D
0.09%
1M
-1.12%
YTD
-7.67%
6M
-10.43%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JANB

1D
-0.22%
1M
2.38%
YTD
6.08%
6M
7.10%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFJL vs. JANB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BFJL
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July
-7.67%-10.39%
JANB
Aptus January Buffer ETF
6.08%2.69%

Correlation

The correlation between BFJL and JANB is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFJL vs. JANB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July (BFJL) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BFJL vs. JANB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BFJLJANBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.14

1.97

-3.11

Drawdowns

BFJL vs. JANB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFJL drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, which is greater than JANB's maximum drawdown of -6.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFJL and JANB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFJLJANBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.27%

-6.52%

-14.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.20%

-0.22%

-20.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.76%

-1.14%

-10.62%

Volatility

BFJL vs. JANB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFJLJANBDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.76%

7.41%

+6.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.76%

7.41%

+6.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.76%

7.41%

+6.35%

BFJL vs. JANB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFJL has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than JANB's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

BFJL vs. JANB - Dividend Comparison

BFJL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, while JANB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


BFJL and JANB have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JANB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JANB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFJL.

BFJL has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 0.00% for JANB.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFJL and 0.25% for JANB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFJL and JANB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer