PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFJL vs. DMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BFJL vs. DMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July (BFJL) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFJL achieves a -7.67% return, which is significantly lower than DMAX's 2.34% return.


BFJL

1D
0.09%
1M
-1.12%
YTD
-7.67%
6M
-10.43%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DMAX

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.86%
YTD
2.34%
6M
3.01%
1Y
8.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFJL vs. DMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BFJL and DMAX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFJL vs. DMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFJL

DMAX
DMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
DMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFJL vs. DMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July (BFJL) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BFJL vs. DMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BFJLDMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.14

2.14

-3.28

Drawdowns

BFJL vs. DMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFJL drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, which is greater than DMAX's maximum drawdown of -3.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFJL and DMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFJLDMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.27%

-3.37%

-17.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.20%

-0.07%

-21.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.76%

-0.38%

-11.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.28%

Volatility

BFJL vs. DMAX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFJLDMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.76%

2.33%

+11.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.76%

3.40%

+10.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.76%

3.40%

+10.36%

BFJL vs. DMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFJL has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than DMAX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

BFJL vs. DMAX - Dividend Comparison

BFJL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, more than DMAX's 1.15% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


BFJL and DMAX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DMAX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DMAX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFJL.

BFJL has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 1.15% for DMAX.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFJL and 0.50% for DMAX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFJL and DMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer