BFJA vs. SETH

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

BFJA (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January) and SETH (ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BFJA is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust, while SETH is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Galaxy Ethereum (--100%). BFJA is actively managed, while SETH is passively managed. Their -0.91 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BFJA charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SETH.

Performance

BFJA vs. SETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January (BFJA) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BFJA

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -0.09%
• 6M: -8.36%
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

SETH

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: -10.40%
• 6M: 4.15%
• YTD: 28.99%
• 1Y: 32.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -31.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BFJA FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January	$278.70	$434.88	$1.70K
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF	$1.05M	$1.13M	$1.85M

BFJA vs. SETH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BFJA FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January	-13.87%
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF	33.71%

Correlation

The correlation between BFJA and SETH is -0.91, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026	-0.91

Return for Risk

BFJA vs. SETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BFJA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SETH

SETH Risk / Return Rank: 25
SETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
SETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
SETH Omega Ratio Rank: 26
SETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
SETH Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BFJA vs. SETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January (BFJA) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BFJA	SETH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.50	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.10	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.13	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.11	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	1.91	—

Drawdowns

BFJA vs. SETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFJA drawdown since its inception was -16.74%, smaller than the maximum SETH drawdown of -80.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFJA and SETH.

Drawdown Indicators

	BFJA	SETH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.74%	-80.74%	+64.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-29.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.93%	-64.57%	+48.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.57%	-55.13%	+44.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	17.31%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BFJA	SETH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	11.35%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	43.88%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.86%	66.92%	-53.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.86%	68.79%	-54.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.86%	68.79%	-54.93%

BFJA vs. SETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFJA has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than SETH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

BFJA vs. SETH - Dividend Comparison

BFJA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.19%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BFJA FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF	22.19%	7.01%	3.44%	0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BFJA and SETH in my portfolio?

BFJA and SETH have a correlation of -0.91, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BFJA or SETH?

On fees, BFJA is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BFJA or SETH?

BFJA is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SETH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BFJA or SETH?

SETH has the higher dividend yield at 22.19%, compared with 0.00% for BFJA.

What is the main difference between BFJA and SETH?

BFJA is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SETH is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFJA and 0.95% for SETH.