BFFAX vs. LSSAX
Compare and contrast key facts about American Funds The Bond Fund of America Class F-3 (BFFAX) and Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX).
BFFAX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on May 28, 1974. LSSAX is managed by Loomis Sayles Funds. It was launched on Mar 2, 2006.
Performance
BFFAX vs. LSSAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BFFAX vs. LSSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFFAX American Funds The Bond Fund of America Class F-3 | -0.53% | 7.54% | 1.54% | 4.39% | -13.00% | -0.97% | 11.12% | 8.17% | 0.22% | 3.07% |
LSSAX Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund | 0.55% | 8.32% | 3.94% | 7.01% | -11.82% | 0.64% | 4.68% | 6.81% | 2.48% | 3.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFFAX achieves a -0.53% return, which is significantly lower than LSSAX's 0.55% return.
BFFAX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- YTD
- -0.53%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 3.72%
- 3Y*
- 3.29%
- 5Y*
- 0.06%
- 10Y*
- —
LSSAX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- YTD
- 0.55%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- 5.07%
- 3Y*
- 5.46%
- 5Y*
- 1.41%
- 10Y*
- 2.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BFFAX vs. LSSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BFFAX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than LSSAX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
BFFAX vs. LSSAX — Risk / Return Rank
BFFAX
LSSAX
BFFAX vs. LSSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds The Bond Fund of America Class F-3 (BFFAX) and Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BFFAX | LSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.92 | 1.46 | -0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | 2.22 | -0.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.27 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 3.63 | -2.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.48 | 10.62 | -6.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BFFAX | LSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 1.46 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.26 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.95 | -0.52 |
Correlation
The correlation between BFFAX and LSSAX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BFFAX vs. LSSAX - Dividend Comparison
BFFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than LSSAX's 3.93% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFFAX American Funds The Bond Fund of America Class F-3 | 4.12% | 4.48% | 4.67% | 3.28% | 2.46% | 1.98% | 5.38% | 3.80% | 2.72% | 2.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LSSAX Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund | 3.93% | 4.23% | 4.54% | 5.65% | 6.47% | 6.38% | 5.95% | 5.48% | 5.62% | 5.42% | 5.12% | 5.20% |
Drawdowns
BFFAX vs. LSSAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFFAX drawdown since its inception was -17.74%, which is greater than LSSAX's maximum drawdown of -16.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFFAX and LSSAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFFAX | LSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.74% | -16.40% | -1.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.94% | -2.45% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.74% | -16.40% | -1.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -16.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.32% | -1.28% | -1.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.74% | -1.98% | -2.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.02% | 0.84% | +0.18% |
Volatility
BFFAX vs. LSSAX - Volatility Comparison
American Funds The Bond Fund of America Class F-3 (BFFAX) has a higher volatility of 1.49% compared to Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX) at 1.24%. This indicates that BFFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BFFAX | LSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.49% | 1.24% | +0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.49% | 2.68% | -0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.40% | 4.69% | -0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.92% | 5.73% | +0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.00% | 4.39% | +0.61% |