BFEB vs. BOCT
BFEB (Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February) and BOCT (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October) are both exchange-traded funds - BFEB is a Options Trading fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index February Series, while BOCT is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500 Price Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BFEB returned 11.48%/yr vs 10.35%/yr for BOCT. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
BFEB vs. BOCT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFEB achieves a 7.14% return, which is significantly higher than BOCT's 6.08% return.
BFEB
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 7.14%
- 6M
- 8.04%
- 1Y
- 19.49%
- 3Y*
- 16.14%
- 5Y*
- 11.48%
- 10Y*
- —
BOCT
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 6.08%
- 6M
- 6.65%
- 1Y
- 18.49%
- 3Y*
- 14.02%
- 5Y*
- 10.35%
- 10Y*
- —
BFEB vs. BOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFEB Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February | 7.14% | 12.99% | 17.58% | 22.35% | -6.76% | 18.05% | 6.01% |
BOCT Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October | 6.08% | 14.34% | 12.36% | 21.13% | -8.14% | 14.97% | 14.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between BFEB and BOCT is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2020 | 0.94 |
The correlation between BFEB and BOCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
BFEB vs. BOCT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BFEB
BOCT
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BFEB
BOCT
Financial Services
BFEB
BOCT
Communication Services
BFEB
BOCT
Consumer Cyclical
BFEB
BOCT
Healthcare
BFEB
BOCT
Industrials
BFEB
BOCT
Consumer Defensive
BFEB
BOCT
Energy
BFEB
BOCT
Utilities
BFEB
BOCT
Real Estate
BFEB
BOCT
Basic Materials
BFEB
BOCT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BFEB vs. BOCT — Risk / Return Rank
BFEB
BOCT
BFEB vs. BOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BFEB | BOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.44 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | 3.05 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.50 | 14.61 | +0.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BFEB | BOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 2.26 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.01 | 0.94 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.75 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
BFEB vs. BOCT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFEB drawdown since its inception was -26.37%, which is greater than BOCT's maximum drawdown of -24.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFEB and BOCT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFEB | BOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.37% | -24.54% | -1.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.41% | -6.09% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.82% | -13.61% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.84% | -14.29% | -0.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -1.17% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.68% | -2.60% | -0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.26% | 1.27% | -0.01% |
Volatility
BFEB vs. BOCT - Volatility Comparison
Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) has a higher volatility of 2.02% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) at 1.76%. This indicates that BFEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BFEB | BOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.02% | 1.76% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.50% | 6.26% | +0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.21% | 8.25% | -0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.41% | 11.11% | +0.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.19% | 13.82% | +0.37% |
BFEB vs. BOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BFEB and BOCT have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
BFEB vs. BOCT - Dividend Comparison
Neither BFEB nor BOCT has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFEB Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BOCT Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, BFEB and BOCT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BFEB has higher volatility (2.02%) compared to BOCT (1.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFEB dropped -26.37% vs BOCT's -24.54%.
On 5-year performance, BFEB leads with 11.48% vs 10.35% for BOCT. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, BOCT has been the lower-risk option at 1.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BFEB has performed better with a 11.48% return vs 10.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BFEB and BOCT have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
BFEB and BOCT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BFEB is categorized as Options Trading, while BOCT is Defined Outcome. BFEB tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index February Series, while BOCT tracks S&P 500 Price Return Index.
BFEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BFEB and BOCT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer