BFAP vs. SOEZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BFAP (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April) and SOEZ (Franklin Solana ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BFAP charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOEZ.

Performance

BFAP vs. SOEZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP) and Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFAP achieves a -20.89% return, which is significantly higher than SOEZ's -40.75% return.

BFAP

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: -7.01%
• YTD: -20.89%
• 6M: -23.66%
• 1Y: -24.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SOEZ

• 1D: -4.56%
• 1M: -14.51%
• YTD: -40.75%
• 6M: -47.84%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFAP vs. SOEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BFAP FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April	-20.89%	-3.50%
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF	-40.75%	-11.97%

Correlation

The correlation between BFAP and SOEZ is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025	0.89

Return for Risk

BFAP vs. SOEZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFAP

BFAP Risk / Return Rank: 1
BFAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BFAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BFAP Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BFAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BFAP Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFAP vs. SOEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP) and Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BFAP	SOEZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.15	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.58	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.81	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.79	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.45	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BFAP	SOEZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.15	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.59	-1.07	+0.48

Drawdowns

BFAP vs. SOEZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFAP drawdown since its inception was -31.25%, smaller than the maximum SOEZ drawdown of -50.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFAP and SOEZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BFAP	SOEZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.25%	-50.21%	+18.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.25%	-50.21%	+18.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.77%	-30.80%	+20.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.89%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BFAP	SOEZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.59%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.66%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.26%	68.92%	-47.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.57%	68.92%	-48.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.57%	68.92%	-48.35%

BFAP vs. SOEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFAP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SOEZ's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

BFAP vs. SOEZ - Dividend Comparison

BFAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.98%, more than SOEZ's 0.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BFAP FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April	23.98%	18.97%
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF	0.57%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BFAP and SOEZ in my portfolio?

BFAP and SOEZ have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BFAP or SOEZ?

On fees, SOEZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BFAP or SOEZ?

SOEZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFAP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BFAP or SOEZ?

BFAP has the higher dividend yield at 23.98%, compared with 0.57% for SOEZ.

What is the main difference between BFAP and SOEZ?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFAP and 0.19% for SOEZ.