PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFAP vs. CEPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BFAP vs. CEPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP) and REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFAP achieves a -21.35% return, which is significantly lower than CEPI's 18.92% return.


BFAP

1D
0.25%
1M
1.78%
6M
-13.09%
YTD
-21.35%
1Y
-29.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-10.97%

CEPI

1D
1.25%
1M
2.09%
6M
17.67%
YTD
18.92%
1Y
21.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$15.29K$11.99K$25.71K
$1.24M$1.26M$1.60M

BFAP vs. CEPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BFAP and CEPI is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025

0.65

The correlation between BFAP and CEPI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFAP vs. CEPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BFAP
BFAP Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BFAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFAP Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BFAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFAP Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

CEPI
CEPI Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
CEPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEPI Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
CEPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEPI Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BFAP vs. CEPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP) and REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BFAPCEPIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

1.15

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.86

0.96

-1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.37

2.24

-3.60

BFAP vs. CEPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFAP Sharpe Ratio is -1.36, which is lower than the CEPI Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFAP and CEPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BFAP vs. CEPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFAP drawdown since its inception was -34.15%, which is greater than CEPI's maximum drawdown of -29.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFAP and CEPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFAPCEPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.15%

-29.48%

-4.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.15%

-22.47%

-11.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.65%

-4.56%

-27.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.41%

-8.22%

-5.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.36%

9.65%

+11.71%

Volatility

BFAP vs. CEPI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP) is 3.75%, while REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI) has a volatility of 11.17%. This indicates that BFAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFAPCEPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

11.17%

-7.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.78%

23.73%

-9.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.57%

29.34%

-7.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.98%

31.88%

-11.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.98%

31.88%

-11.90%

BFAP vs. CEPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFAP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than CEPI's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

BFAP vs. CEPI - Dividend Comparison

BFAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.12%, less than CEPI's 44.15% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


BFAP and CEPI have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CEPI has higher volatility (11.17%) compared to BFAP (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFAP dropped -34.15% vs CEPI's -29.48%.

On 1-year performance, CEPI leads with 21.57% vs -29.14% for BFAP. On fees, CEPI is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, BFAP has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CEPI has performed better with a 21.57% return vs -29.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CEPI is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFAP.

CEPI has the higher dividend yield at 44.15%, compared with 24.12% for BFAP.

BFAP is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CEPI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFAP and 0.85% for CEPI.

CEPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs -1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFAP and CEPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer