PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BEZ vs. ARCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BEZ vs. ARCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Short BE Daily ETF (BEZ) and Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BEZ

1D
19.75%
1M
-5.14%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARCX

1D
-26.35%
1M
-28.89%
YTD
-57.42%
6M
-68.43%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BEZ vs. ARCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BEZ and ARCX is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2026

-0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BEZ vs. ARCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short BE Daily ETF (BEZ) and Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BEZ vs. ARCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BEZARCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.45

-0.63

+0.18

Drawdowns

BEZ vs. ARCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEZ drawdown since its inception was -94.19%, roughly equal to the maximum ARCX drawdown of -91.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEZ and ARCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BEZARCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.19%

-91.51%

-2.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.58%

-90.32%

-2.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.62%

-64.61%

+3.99%

Volatility

BEZ vs. ARCX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BEZARCXDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

224.98%

140.73%

+84.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

224.98%

140.73%

+84.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

224.98%

140.73%

+84.25%

BEZ vs. ARCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BEZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ARCX's 1.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

BEZ vs. ARCX - Dividend Comparison

Neither BEZ nor ARCX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BEZ and ARCX have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ARCX is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ARCX is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for BEZ.

BEZ and ARCX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BEZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while ARCX is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for BEZ and 1.30% for ARCX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BEZ and ARCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer