BEX vs. XDSQ
BEX (Tradr 2X Long BE Daily ETF) and XDSQ (Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BEX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XDSQ.
Performance
BEX vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BEX
- 1D
- -13.99%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDSQ
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 3.05%
- 6M
- 2.05%
- 1Y
- 15.05%
- 3Y*
- 14.47%
- 5Y*
- 9.68%
- 10Y*
- —
BEX vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BEX Tradr 2X Long BE Daily ETF | -4.58% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | 0.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between BEX and XDSQ is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEX vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank
BEX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XDSQ
BEX vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEX) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BEX | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.58 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.51 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BEX vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEX drawdown since its inception was -47.06%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEX and XDSQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEX | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.06% | -26.06% | -21.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.99% | -0.03% | -13.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.05% | -4.91% | -17.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.01% | — |
Volatility
BEX vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BEX | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.62% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.09% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 205.49% | 10.50% | +194.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 205.49% | 15.28% | +190.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 205.49% | 15.02% | +190.47% |
BEX vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BEX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
BEX vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither BEX nor XDSQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BEX and XDSQ have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDSQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDSQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for BEX.
BEX and XDSQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for BEX and 0.79% for XDSQ.
Find the right allocation for BEX and XDSQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer