BEX vs. UWM
BEX (Tradr 2X Long BE Daily ETF) and UWM (ProShares Ultra Russell2000) are both Leveraged Equities funds. BEX is actively managed, while UWM is passively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BEX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for UWM.
Performance
BEX vs. UWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BEX
- 1D
- -13.99%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UWM
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- 6.86%
- YTD
- 38.71%
- 6M
- 32.01%
- 1Y
- 81.03%
- 3Y*
- 27.92%
- 5Y*
- 1.93%
- 10Y*
- 13.44%
BEX vs. UWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BEX Tradr 2X Long BE Daily ETF | -4.58% |
UWM ProShares Ultra Russell2000 | 6.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between BEX and UWM is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEX vs. UWM — Risk / Return Rank
BEX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UWM
BEX vs. UWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEX) and ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BEX | UWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.66 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.47 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BEX vs. UWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEX drawdown since its inception was -47.06%, smaller than the maximum UWM drawdown of -88.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEX and UWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEX | UWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.06% | -88.21% | +41.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -22.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -49.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -61.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -71.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.99% | -1.93% | -12.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.05% | -30.80% | +8.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.52% | — |
Volatility
BEX vs. UWM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BEX | UWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.03% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 28.39% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 205.49% | 39.12% | +166.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 205.49% | 45.16% | +160.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 205.49% | 46.13% | +159.36% |
BEX vs. UWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
BEX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than UWM's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
BEX vs. UWM - Dividend Comparison
BEX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEX Tradr 2X Long BE Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UWM ProShares Ultra Russell2000 | 0.74% | 1.05% | 1.16% | 0.34% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.55% | 0.41% | 0.11% | 0.27% | 0.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BEX and UWM have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UWM is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UWM is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for BEX.
UWM has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.00% for BEX.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for BEX and 0.95% for UWM.
Find the right allocation for BEX and UWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer