PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BETH vs. SSO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BETH vs. SSO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BETH vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BETH
ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF
-23.96%-11.20%85.03%42.75%
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500
-8.90%26.19%43.48%22.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BETH achieves a -23.96% return, which is significantly lower than SSO's -8.90% return.


BETH

1D
0.78%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
-23.96%
6M
-44.92%
1Y
-19.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SSO

1D
1.48%
1M
-9.07%
YTD
-8.90%
6M
-6.36%
1Y
27.41%
3Y*
28.90%
5Y*
15.68%
10Y*
21.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BETH vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BETH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BETH vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BETH
BETH Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
BETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
BETH Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
BETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
BETH Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

SSO
SSO Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BETH vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BETHSSODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.40

0.76

-1.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.28

1.27

-1.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.19

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.32

1.22

-1.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.67

5.19

-5.86

BETH vs. SSO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BETH Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the SSO Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BETH and SSO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BETHSSODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.40

0.76

-1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.38

+0.13

Correlation

The correlation between BETH and SSO is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BETH vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison

BETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 62.89%, more than SSO's 0.81% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BETH
ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF
62.89%57.68%19.71%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500
0.81%0.68%0.85%0.18%0.50%0.18%0.20%0.50%0.75%0.39%0.51%0.63%

Drawdowns

BETH vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BETH drawdown since its inception was -52.55%, smaller than the maximum SSO drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETH and SSO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BETHSSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.55%

-84.67%

+32.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.55%

-23.17%

-29.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.62%

-12.18%

-36.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.81%

-19.72%

+3.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.90%

5.44%

+19.46%

Volatility

BETH vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH) has a higher volatility of 13.77% compared to ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) at 10.69%. This indicates that BETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BETHSSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.77%

10.69%

+3.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.46%

18.99%

+20.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.58%

36.46%

+12.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.11%

33.66%

+18.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.11%

35.86%

+16.25%