BETE vs. SCUS

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BETE (Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF) and SCUS (Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BETE is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares, while SCUS is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Charles Schwab. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BETE returned -46.67% vs 3.86% for SCUS. Their -0.07 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BETE charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for SCUS.

Performance

BETE vs. SCUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) and Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF (SCUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BETE achieves a -34.37% return, which is significantly lower than SCUS's 2.02% return.

BETE

• 1D: -3.01%
• 1M: 5.60%
• 6M: -28.81%
• YTD: -34.37%
• 1Y: -46.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.68%

SCUS

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.36%
• 6M: 1.74%
• YTD: 2.02%
• 1Y: 3.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BETE Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF	$107.88K	$90.06K	$96.80K
SCUS Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF	$2.59M	$2.50M	$2.92M

BETE vs. SCUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BETE Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF	-34.37%	-8.17%	37.40%
SCUS Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF	2.02%	4.51%	2.00%

Correlation

The correlation between BETE and SCUS is -0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2024	-0.07

Return for Risk

BETE vs. SCUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BETE

BETE Risk / Return Rank: 3
BETE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BETE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BETE Omega Ratio Rank: 3
BETE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BETE Martin Ratio Rank: 3

SCUS

SCUS Risk / Return Rank: 99
SCUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
SCUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
SCUS Omega Ratio Rank: 99
SCUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
SCUS Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BETE vs. SCUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) and Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF (SCUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BETE	SCUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.89	5.76	-6.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.30	10.88	-12.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	2.53	-1.67
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.80	23.81	-24.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.21	100.29	-101.50

BETE vs. SCUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BETE Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is lower than the SCUS Sharpe Ratio of 5.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BETE and SCUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BETE vs. SCUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BETE drawdown since its inception was -61.75%, which is greater than SCUS's maximum drawdown of -0.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETE and SCUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BETE	SCUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.75%	-0.17%	-61.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-61.75%	-0.17%	-61.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.97%	0.00%	-56.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.44%	-0.02%	-23.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	40.62%	0.04%	+40.58%

Volatility

BETE vs. SCUS - Volatility Comparison

Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) has a higher volatility of 11.10% compared to Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF (SCUS) at 0.20%. This indicates that BETE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BETE	SCUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.10%	0.20%	+10.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.57%	0.52%	+39.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	55.28%	0.69%	+54.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	56.01%	0.70%	+55.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	56.01%	0.70%	+55.31%

BETE vs. SCUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BETE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SCUS's 0.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

BETE vs. SCUS - Dividend Comparison

BETE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 79.50%, more than SCUS's 3.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BETE Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF	64.54%	68.22%	15.22%	0.78%
SCUS Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF	3.51%	4.17%	1.62%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BETE and SCUS in my portfolio?

BETE and SCUS have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BETE or SCUS?

BETE has higher volatility (11.10%) compared to SCUS (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BETE dropped -61.75% vs SCUS's -0.17%.

Which ETF is better, BETE or SCUS?

On 1-year performance, SCUS leads with 3.86% vs -46.67% for BETE. On fees, SCUS is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, SCUS has been the lower-risk option at 0.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BETE or SCUS?

Over the 1-year period, SCUS has performed better with a 3.86% return vs -46.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BETE or SCUS?

SCUS is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BETE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BETE or SCUS?

BETE has the higher dividend yield at 64.54%, compared with 3.51% for SCUS.

What is the main difference between BETE and SCUS?

BETE is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SCUS is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BETE and 0.14% for SCUS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.76 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.